Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?

[Megiddo]

Grace, Peace and Blessings to the body of 1480 

I would like to share an amazing Base 7 code I found in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24. 

We know that Enoch is identified as the 7th from Adam. With this in mind, observe that the very name of Enoch is itself a 3-D Triangle (i.e. the sum of the first 7 Triangles): 

"Enoch" (SH) = 84 

"Enoch" (SH) = (3 × 7) + (3 × 7) + (7 × 3) + (7 × 3) 

Enoch = The 7th from Adam 

T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 = "Enoch" (SH) 


I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows: 

1^3 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831 


Why is this significant? It's the Standard Hebrew value of the key Enoch verse of the Bible! 

Genesis 5:24 
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him" 

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831



2368 created the universe, 

Leo Tavares 

[RAMcGough]

I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows: 

1^3 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831 

This math twists my brain a bit. You calculated 7 cubes in base 7, but then added them as if they were base 10 numbers. That feels like a very strange mathematical transformation. If you added them in base 7, they would come to 2200 base 7 = 784 base 10 and 784 = 28^2 = T(7)^2. That's a example of this simple theorem:

Sum of cubes 1 to n = T(n)^2

I first noticed this in 2025 because the 45th President was reelected in 2025 = Sum of cubes from 1 to 9 = T(9)^2 = 45^2.

[Megiddo]

You don't see any significance in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24 yielding a base 10 sum of the first 7 cubes converted to base 7?

Humans are base 10 creatures and the Bible itself is a base 10 book (when dealing with numbers in its open text). The reasoning behind the base 7 conversion is the obvious association of 7 with the Biblical Enoch.


Blessings,

Leo

[RAMcGough]

You don't see any significance in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24 yielding a base 10 sum of the first 7 cubes converted to base 7?

Humans are base 10 creatures and the Bible itself is a base 10 book (when dealing with numbers in its open text). The reasoning behind the base 7 conversion is the obvious association of 7 with the Biblical Enoch.


Blessings,

Leo

I can see what you did, but it doesn't strike me as meaningful because it feels like a random "one-off". Here's my logic:

1) Why sum cubes? Why not square or triangles?
2) Why interpret the sum as base 10 if it was actually base 7?
3) Why not sum the cubes in base 7 and convert the base 10 value 1831 of Gen 5:24 to base 7?
4) etc. etc. etc.

There so many arbitrary choices and possibilities. How do we discern between chance and design?

I don't have any of these kinds of questions when I analyze Genesis 1:1-5, John 1:1-5 and Deuteronomy 6:4-5 using standard gematria. The results are real proof of design. That's why they are so convincing to me.

Many blessings!

[Megiddo]

I actually did sum the first 7 Triangles and it yields the value of Enoch himself (84).

We use the first 7 cubes because it yields the prime 3/7 pattern of the Biblical proto-verse (Genesis 1:1):

1^3 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831

We sum in base 10 because we began with base 10 cubes and converted to base 7 because of the Biblical association of Enoch with the number 7.


There's much more to it than this. For example, the Standard value of "God took him" = Hexagon 631 = The precise Hexagon that pairs with Logos Star 373, which is itself formed with 7 Stars of 37:

"God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631

The PERIMETER of Hexagon 631 = 84 = "Enoch" (SH)

Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373

Logos Star 373 = 7 Stars of 37

Enoch = The SEVENTH from Adam

"SEVENTH" (SG) = 391

391 × (37 × 7) = The 37th 3-D Star

[RAMcGough]

I actually did sum the first 7 Triangles and it yields the value of Enoch himsel (84).

Well that's interesting! It is true that the sum of the first 7 triangles is 84. Did you mention that before? If so, I missed it.

But still, it's not a clear motivation to sum cubes. What did you get by summing squares?

Is this your basic research method? Do you have a program that does all these sums so you can quickly scan it for hits? That's the essence of "cherry picking" and I think that's why I often have a hard time seeing these kinds of patterns as "significant."

BTW - if you don't have a program, I could get Grok to write an html/js page real quick. It's written dozens of pages like that for me.

We use the first 7 cubes because it yields the prime 3/7 pattern of the Biblical proto-verse (Genesis 1:1):

1^3 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831

Did you mean "yields" the pattern or "uses" the pattern (i.e. uses the numbers 3 & 7 in the arbitrary combination). You could have tried powers of 7 in base 3, or whatever. You could have summed 3 times mod 7, or any number of other patterns. This is the problem here. It feels like scanning through an infinite set of formulas, functions, number combinations looking for "hits". That's the definition of cherry picking, and it's very difficult to discern between a meaningful "hit' and a random coincidence.

I think the best thing we should do is see if your PRIMARY RESEARCH is based on any PRINCIPLES that are consistently applied. If we can't do that, then it would be pretty difficult to get a serious mathematician to bother looking at the results.

My philosophy is LESS IS MORE. That's why I've refined the Gen-John stuff down to consistent equations and show Genesis 1:1 is reiteratively structured on the same geometric form of hex/star pairs H(n) x S(n) which are themselves generated by symmetrical self-intersection of a triangle and its mirror image. I find that deep and compelling.

We sum in base 10 because we began with base 10 cubes and converted to base 7 because of the Biblical association of Enoch with the number 7.

Your sums look like base 7 cubes, not base ten. Am I getting that wrong?

2^3 = 8 base 10 and 11 base 7. You listed it as 11 in base 7.

There's much more to it than this. For example, the Standard value of "God took him" = Hexagon 631 = The precise Hexagon that pairs with Logos Star 373, which is itself formed with 7 Stars of 37:

"God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631

The PERIMETER of Hexagon 631 = 84 = "Enoch" (SH)

Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373

Logos Star 373 = 7 Stars of 37

"SEVENTH" (SG) = 391

391 × (37 × 7) = The 37th 3-D Star

It's very interesting that you found "God took him" = 631 = H(15) and it's perimeter = 84 (Enoch). That's the kind of self-reflectivity that catches my attention.

What do you mean when you say that "Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373"? There are a couple ways to create it from other geometric objects. You can create the star 337 and add 12 T(2) triangles, or you can arrange 7 S(3) stars filled in with 6 H(3) hexagons. How does the 631 hexagon H(15) fit into this scenario? Is there a third way to create it?

[bluetriangle]

We know that Enoch is identified as the 7th from Adam. With this in mind, observe that the very name of Enoch is itself a 3-D Triangle (i.e. the sum of the first 7 Triangles): 

"Enoch" (SH) = 84 

"Enoch" (SH) = (3 × 7) + (3 × 7) + (7 × 3) + (7 × 3) 

Enoch = The 7th from Adam 

T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 = "Enoch" (SH) 


I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows: 

1^3 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831 

Why is this significant? It's the Standard Hebrew value of the key Enoch verse of the Bible! 

Genesis 5:24 
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him" 

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831

Hi Leo.

I reserve judgment on your finding, although it's certainly of interest.

The numbers in these genealogical lists are of interest in themselves and when summed.

Enoch lived for 365 years, this being the 14th centred square. The numbers linked to Enoch (65, 300, 365) sum to 730, the sum of two cubes (1^ + 9^3) and of two squares (1^2 + 27^2).

I always found it intriguing that Methuselah lived to 969 years, this of course being the 17th tetrahedral number and perhaps pointing to 153.

But the real interest, for me, has been taking a running total of the numbers in the list, which continues in Genesis 9 and in fact throughout Genesis. I've tabulated them below, which might be of interest to anyone researching it (bear in mind that in the last verse of Genesis, Joseph's age is repeated, giving 20998).

It contains several patterns. Here's one:

The sum to the 666th verse is 20391 and the sum to the 1529th verse is 20888 (373 x 56). This of course suggests 391 and 888, Yehoshua and Ihsous. These totals also encompass the lives of the three Patriarchs. All four numbers are meaningful in English gematria.

Bill

[Megiddo]

Hi Richard, 

Yes, I mentioned that "Enoch" (SH) = 84 = The sum of the first 7 Triangles in my opening post here. 

I wouldn't say I'm scanning through an infinite set of formulas. I simply used the 3/7 pattern (highlighting the foundational prime of 37) by taking the first 7 cubes, converting them into base 7 and then summing them back in base 10 (that's what I meant when I said we began with base 10 and ended with base 10): 

1^3 = 1 and 1 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 = 8 and 8 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 = 27 and 27 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 = 64 and 64 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 = 125 and 125 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 = 216 and 216 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 = 343 and 343 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831 (in Base 10) 

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831 

For anyone who wants to verify what I did, they can do so here : https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/num ... erter.html


Surely you didn't think this was my only reason for believing in what I call "The Enoch Code"? As far as I'm aware, I was the first researcher in this community to emphasize the importance of repeatedly self-referencing identities (where the highlighted convergence of Biblical identities has to be logically warranted and unambiguous). The real gem is Hexagon 631 and everything that flows from it.

I'm glad you can appreciate that "God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631, while the outline of this Hexagon = "Enoch" (SH) = 84. However, all of this is just the beginning: 

"Enoch" (SH) = 84 

Enoch = The SEVENTH from Adam 

84 × 7 = 588 

"The SEVENTH from Adam" (SG) = 588 


Yes, Hexagon 631 accommodates Logos Star 373 (i.e. the Logos Star touches the edges of the Hexagon), which is significant because as you know, the Logos Star itself is built around 7 Stars of 37. As a matter of fact, the Star formed from this Hexagon yields 888 counters when sectioned off by the Logos Star (i.e. 1261 - 373 = 888) and "Jesus" (SG) = 888. I discovered this back in 2017. 

I should probably answer your question before you ask it: The MEANING of the Enoch code is to highlight the typology of Christ in the first Prophet of the Bible. 



Blessings, 

Leo

[Geert van den Bos]

Hi Leo,

I cannot really follow your calculations, but I saw you did stress 7 cubes.

There is some strange thing about Genesis 1:1, in that if you lift out the letter "shin" from "hashamayim" you would read

"bereishit bara elohim et-hamayim v'et haaretz" (in the beginning God created the water and the earth)

letter value of "shin" = 300

so value of the verse would be 2701- 300 = 2401

2401 = 7 x 7 x 7 x 7 = 7 cubes 7

"ruach elohim" (= Spirit of God) = 214 + 86 = 300

so you might read Genesis 1:1 as "the spirit of God hovering over the face of the water" -- mentioned in Genesis 1:2

to which might allude Mark 1:10,
And when he came up out of the water, immediately he saw the heavens being torn open and the Spirit descending on him like a dove.

[RAMcGough]

Hi Richard, 

Yes, I mentioned that "Enoch" (SH) = 84 = The sum of the first 7 Triangles in my opening post here. 

Hello my dear brother!

Yes, of course you did! Sorry for asking such an dumb question. I'm getting a little overwhelmed with all the patterns I'm reviewing simultaneously from you, Alex, LJ and Bill. But I'm lovin' it! Keep em coming!

I wouldn't say I'm scanning through an infinite set of formulas.

I wrote that shortly after I was reviewing this equation where you accidentally omitted the parentheses:

P(703) + P(2701) x 37 = T1480

That sent me down a rabbit path. I thought you were using the function f(a,b) = P(T(a)) + P(T(b)) x a which seemed very arbitrary.

The actual function that you did use is f(a,b) = [PT(a)) + P(T(b))] x a. It feels pretty much as random as the one I thought you used. I just can't see any logic for looking for patterns created by such functions. Where's the motivation for that particular function?

I highly respect your work Leo. You have found many important patterns. This may reveal my own shortcomings, but here's what I feel about patterns in the digits of pi: They are either meaningless coincidences OR they reveal an underlying necessary structure within pi. If the latter is true, then the first thing I would want to do is understand the exact mathematical nature of that patterns and prove revolutionary new theorems about the nature of pi that would be published in mathematical journals. If that underlying order can't be found, then it would suggest to me that the patterns are just the result of random coincidences. In either case, they are NOT the product of intentional divine design since they are necessary consequence of math.

I'm looking for the underlying UNITY of all the patterns we all see. I feel very strongly that I can create a coherent, mathematically defensible (under professional peer review), presentation of the patterns in Genesis, John & Deut. I don't feel that way about anything based on cherry picking or connections via unmotivated formulas connecting to the digits of pi. God may have done those things for His own reasons, but for the work He's given me to do, I need those things that are founded on the rock of objectively verifiable reality which bring glory to His Word by revealing a truly divine integration of the plain text of the 6 days of creation + Sabbath memorialized by God Himself in the pattern of the Menorah which is an unfolded centered hexagon which is a cube projected into 2D which is the basis of hexagonal numbers and echoed in the six directions of 3D space which forms the monogram of Jesus Christ IX with all of this miraculously encoded in the hex/star algebraic geometry of Genesis 1:1 which also is derived from symmetric self-intersection of equilateral triangles which create mirrored primes relating to differences of cubes (64 - 27 = 37 = H(4)) forming again the monogram of Jesus Christ through the Discrete Fourier Transform applied to the seven words of Genesis in the prime modular field Z/37Z based on the 37th ROOT OF UNITY = e^iπn/37, etc., etc., etc., etc., etc., etc.

I don't mean to overwhelm, but I feel like God has truly revealed His MATHEMATICALLY PERFECT DIVINE MIND in Genesis 1:1 and related verses. And it's totally COHERENT and UNIFIED and anything less than that only detracts from the glory of His revelation. Many people have seen fragments of this design. Pioneers like Jenkins and Bluer. We just need to work together to UNIFY all the fragments we have seen. No one has a vision of THE ALL. So we need to work together to clarify, organize, categorize, refine, condense down to the purest essence God intended until it all becomes ONE VISION that will enlighten the world to the truth of God's Word.

Psalm 12:6 The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.

.

I simply used the 3/7 pattern (highlighting the foundational prime of 37) by taking the first 7 cubes, converting them into base 7 and then summing them back in base 10 (that's what I meant when I said we began with base 10 and ended with base 10): 

1^3 = 1 and 1 in Base 7 = 1 
2^3 = 8 and 8 in Base 7 = 11 
3^3 = 27 and 27 in Base 7 = 36 
4^3 = 64 and 64 in Base 7 = 121 
5^3 = 125 and 125 in Base 7 = 236 
6^3 = 216 and 216 in Base 7 = 426 
7^3 = 343 and 343 in Base 7 = 1000 

Total sum = 1831 (in Base 10) 

Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831 

For anyone who wants to verify what I did, they can do so here : https://www.rapidtables.com/convert/num ... erter.html

Yes your calculation of the sum of the first seven cubes is valid. It is 784 base 10 = 2200 base 7. The problem is you added those 7 individual base 7 cubes as if they were 7 base 10 numbers to get 1831 in base 10 rather than the correct sum of 2200 base 7. Yes, this number matches the gematria of Genesis 5:24, but that is a very circuitous route to get there! It feels contrary to the principles of reason that define mathematics itself. I can't imagine a serious teacher giving a puzzle to a math student that depended on the math student MISINTERPRETING the base to get the desired sum.

Please don't take any offense at anything I write. I respect your work VERY HIGHLY! Maybe I'm blind to the glory God has revealed to you. I'm a weak old man. All I know is that I feel like my mind is on fire with the light and love of God and His Truth. We must burn away all errors and all human pride and look for what GOD HIMSELF is teaching in His Word. We must come together in the unity of the faith and discern the truth of what God has really done here.

Surely you didn't think this was my only reason for believing in what I call "The Enoch Code"? As far as I'm aware, I was the first researcher in this community to emphasize the importance of repeatedly self-referencing identities (where the highlighted convergence of Biblical identities has to be logically warranted and unambiguous). The real gem is Hexagon 631 and everything that flows from it.

You're right Leo. I most certainly do not think that! I was truly thrilled when I saw your emphasis on repeatedly self-referencing identities. I've found that to be the hermeneutical key to God's Word. God Himself enacted this principle by repeatedly stating it in His Own Word!

Deu 17:6 At the mouth of two witnesses, or three witnesses, shall he that is worthy of death be put to death; but at the mouth of one witness he shall not be put to death.

Mat 18:16 But if he will not hear thee, then take with thee one or two more, that in the mouth of two or three witnesses every word may be established.

2Co 13:1 This is the third time I am coming to you. In the mouth of two or three witnesses shall every word be established.

I'm glad you can appreciate that "God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631, while the outline of this Hexagon = "Enoch" (SH) = 84. However, all of this is just the beginning: 

"Enoch" (SH) = 84 

Enoch = The SEVENTH from Adam 

84 × 7 = 588 

"The SEVENTH from Adam" (SG) = 588 

That is a good hit! We need to organize all the evidence in a single unified diagram - a "holograph". That's why I chose that term.

Yes, Hexagon 631 accommodates Logos Star 373 (i.e. the Logos Star touches the edges of the Hexagon), which is significant because as you know, the Logos Star itself is built around 7 Stars of 37. As a matter of fact, the Star formed from this Hexagon yields 888 counters when sectioned off by the Logos Star (i.e. 1261 - 373 = 888) and "Jesus" (SG) = 888. I discovered this back in 2017. 

It would be good to clearly state (and prove) the relation between KS(n,k) and the hexagons that contain them.

Did I mention that I've derived a formula for the Koch Star sequence? It requires two variables. One for the iteration (k) and one for the sequence of figurate numbers that fit that iteration.

image.png (6.29 KiB) Viewed 68322 times

KS(n,1) = T(n), KS(n,2) = S(n).

image.png (14.95 KiB) Viewed 68322 times

The highlighted primes are all ABSOLUTE PRIMES (aka permutable primes). There very rare. Only 17 are known to exist, and they are all under 1000. They form seven groups. God used three of those groups in his Creation Holograph. Here they are - I've highlighted the ones God used in Creation Holograph:

{13, 31}, {17, 71}, {37, 73}, {79, 97}, {113, 131, 311}, {199, 919, 991}, {337, 373, 733}.

Could there be a better name for the primes God used in his Creation Holograph? And look! The six highlighted yellow in the table are all Koch Snowflake iterations. This is truly astounding.

The last group - the LOGOS group - is particularly stunning. The Number 337 = is the Star of David defines the LOGOS Star 373.

And 733? I'll let you guess for now. It's the capstone of everything I've seen!

I should probably answer your question before you ask it: The MEANING of the Enoch code is to highlight the typology of Christ in the first Prophet of the Bible. 



Blessings, 

Leo

That sounds very intriguing. I look forward to discussing it more.

May God continue to bless you mightily my brother,

Richard

Christ is King! Let us rejoice!