Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
Grace, Peace and Blessings to the body of 1480
I would like to share an amazing Base 7 code I found in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24.
We know that Enoch is identified as the 7th from Adam. With this in mind, observe that the very name of Enoch is itself a 3-D Triangle (i.e. the sum of the first 7 Triangles):
"Enoch" (SH) = 84
"Enoch" (SH) = (3 × 7) + (3 × 7) + (7 × 3) + (7 × 3)
Enoch = The 7th from Adam
T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 = "Enoch" (SH)
I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows:
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Why is this significant? It's the Standard Hebrew value of the key Enoch verse of the Bible!
Genesis 5:24
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him"
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
2368 created the universe,
Leo Tavares
I would like to share an amazing Base 7 code I found in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24.
We know that Enoch is identified as the 7th from Adam. With this in mind, observe that the very name of Enoch is itself a 3-D Triangle (i.e. the sum of the first 7 Triangles):
"Enoch" (SH) = 84
"Enoch" (SH) = (3 × 7) + (3 × 7) + (7 × 3) + (7 × 3)
Enoch = The 7th from Adam
T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 = "Enoch" (SH)
I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows:
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Why is this significant? It's the Standard Hebrew value of the key Enoch verse of the Bible!
Genesis 5:24
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him"
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
2368 created the universe,
Leo Tavares
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
This math twists my brain a bit. You calculated 7 cubes in base 7, but then added them as if they were base 10 numbers. That feels like a very strange mathematical transformation. If you added them in base 7, they would come to 2200 base 7 = 784 base 10 and 784 = 28^2 = T(7)^2. That's a example of this simple theorem:Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:17 pm
I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows:
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Sum of cubes 1 to n = T(n)^2
I first noticed this in 2025 because the 45th President was reelected in 2025 = Sum of cubes from 1 to 9 = T(9)^2 = 45^2.
Praising God all the day long!
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
You don't see any significance in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24 yielding a base 10 sum of the first 7 cubes converted to base 7?
Humans are base 10 creatures and the Bible itself is a base 10 book (when dealing with numbers in its open text). The reasoning behind the base 7 conversion is the obvious association of 7 with the Biblical Enoch.
Blessings,
Leo
Humans are base 10 creatures and the Bible itself is a base 10 book (when dealing with numbers in its open text). The reasoning behind the base 7 conversion is the obvious association of 7 with the Biblical Enoch.
Blessings,
Leo
-
SonOfZion232
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2025 4:08 pm
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
I believe that the Great Pyramid of which the Scriptures mentions many times was built by Enoch and by some it is called the Bible in Stone, Earth's blueprint.
How did he build it? IDK
The very first thing that I ever learned that started my interest in Gematria were these two verses.
Isaiah 19:19
In that day shall there be an altar to YHWH in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to YHWH.
20 And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto YHWH of Hosts in the land of Egypt: for they shall cry unto YHWH because of the oppressors, and He shall send them a Saviour, and a great One, and He shall deliver them.
The Numerical Value of these two verses in Hebrew equals the helght of the Great Pyramid in pyramid inches, a measurement of the builders from the base to where the capstone would have been placed if the Great Pyramid would have had a capstone put on it.
Psalms 118;22
The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
23 This is YHWH's doing; it is marvellous in our eyes.
Matthew 21:42
Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Mark 12:10
And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner:
Luke 20:17
And He beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner?
Acts 4:11
This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
1 Peter 2:7
Unto you therefore which believe He is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
There are so many places to begin,
Here are just a few
Notice that the Altar and Pillar are the same thing, It will be for a sign and a witness
A Altar in the Middle of Egypt, and a Pillar at the Border
Giza means the edge in ancient Egyptian, the Edge or Border between upper and lower Egypt, In the Midst and at the Border, One Monument
Only on a pyramid shape is the capstone also The Head of all the Corners.
Enoch lives 365 years which also is found encoded in the base of the GP
and this is just for starters
There isn't a monument on earth that has been measured more than the Great Pyramid.
Jeremiah 32:20
Which hast set signs and wonders in the land of Egypt, even unto this day, and in Israel, and among other men; and hast made Thee a Name, as at this day;
The word Ark in Hebrew comes from the word aron which means chest or box, the stone box in the King's Chamber is the same cubic volume as the Ark of the Covenant, The room is the same cubic volume as Solomon's laver.
Looking from above with aerial photography was how it was discovered that all of the sides are concave, matching the radius of the earth.
The Great Pyramid is at the center of all of earth's landmass, Equal amounts of landmass, north - south - east - west quadrants.
The most accurately positioned structure ever built that aligns with true north, the goal of modern observatories.
mean height, temperature all encoded
The Great Pyramid did not always look as “rough” as it does today. Originally it was encased with a layer of tight-fitting, highly polished 20-ton stone slabs. The casing stones, 144,000 in all, were so brilliant that they could literally be seen from the mountains of Israel hundreds of miles away.
Egyptians used them to build their cities, Egyptologists are just like Evolutionists, liars like their father.
How did he build it? IDK
The very first thing that I ever learned that started my interest in Gematria were these two verses.
Isaiah 19:19
In that day shall there be an altar to YHWH in the midst of the land of Egypt, and a pillar at the border thereof to YHWH.
20 And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto YHWH of Hosts in the land of Egypt: for they shall cry unto YHWH because of the oppressors, and He shall send them a Saviour, and a great One, and He shall deliver them.
The Numerical Value of these two verses in Hebrew equals the helght of the Great Pyramid in pyramid inches, a measurement of the builders from the base to where the capstone would have been placed if the Great Pyramid would have had a capstone put on it.
Psalms 118;22
The stone which the builders refused is become the head stone of the corner.
23 This is YHWH's doing; it is marvellous in our eyes.
Matthew 21:42
Jesus saith unto them, Did ye never read in the scriptures, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner: this is the Lord's doing, and it is marvellous in our eyes?
Mark 12:10
And have ye not read this scripture; The stone which the builders rejected is become the head of the corner:
Luke 20:17
And He beheld them, and said, What is this then that is written, The stone which the builders rejected, the same is become the head of the corner?
Acts 4:11
This is the stone which was set at nought of you builders, which is become the head of the corner.
1 Peter 2:7
Unto you therefore which believe He is precious: but unto them which be disobedient, the stone which the builders disallowed, the same is made the head of the corner,
There are so many places to begin,
Here are just a few
Notice that the Altar and Pillar are the same thing, It will be for a sign and a witness
A Altar in the Middle of Egypt, and a Pillar at the Border
Giza means the edge in ancient Egyptian, the Edge or Border between upper and lower Egypt, In the Midst and at the Border, One Monument
Only on a pyramid shape is the capstone also The Head of all the Corners.
Enoch lives 365 years which also is found encoded in the base of the GP
and this is just for starters
There isn't a monument on earth that has been measured more than the Great Pyramid.
Jeremiah 32:20
Which hast set signs and wonders in the land of Egypt, even unto this day, and in Israel, and among other men; and hast made Thee a Name, as at this day;
The word Ark in Hebrew comes from the word aron which means chest or box, the stone box in the King's Chamber is the same cubic volume as the Ark of the Covenant, The room is the same cubic volume as Solomon's laver.
Looking from above with aerial photography was how it was discovered that all of the sides are concave, matching the radius of the earth.
The Great Pyramid is at the center of all of earth's landmass, Equal amounts of landmass, north - south - east - west quadrants.
The most accurately positioned structure ever built that aligns with true north, the goal of modern observatories.
mean height, temperature all encoded
The Great Pyramid did not always look as “rough” as it does today. Originally it was encased with a layer of tight-fitting, highly polished 20-ton stone slabs. The casing stones, 144,000 in all, were so brilliant that they could literally be seen from the mountains of Israel hundreds of miles away.
Egyptians used them to build their cities, Egyptologists are just like Evolutionists, liars like their father.
Last edited by SonOfZion232 on Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:53 pm, edited 7 times in total.
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
I can see what you did, but it doesn't strike me as meaningful because it feels like a random "one-off". Here's my logic:Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:57 pm You don't see any significance in the key Enoch verse of Genesis 5:24 yielding a base 10 sum of the first 7 cubes converted to base 7?
Humans are base 10 creatures and the Bible itself is a base 10 book (when dealing with numbers in its open text). The reasoning behind the base 7 conversion is the obvious association of 7 with the Biblical Enoch.
Blessings,
Leo
1) Why sum cubes? Why not square or triangles?
2) Why interpret the sum as base 10 if it was actually base 7?
3) Why not sum the cubes in base 7 and convert the base 10 value 1831 of Gen 5:24 to base 7?
4) etc. etc. etc.
There so many arbitrary choices and possibilities. How do we discern between chance and design?
I don't have any of these kinds of questions when I analyze Genesis 1:1-5, John 1:1-5 and Deuteronomy 6:4-5 using standard gematria. The results are real proof of design. That's why they are so convincing to me.
Many blessings!
Praising God all the day long!
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
I actually did sum the first 7 Triangles and it yields the value of Enoch himself (84).
We use the first 7 cubes because it yields the prime 3/7 pattern of the Biblical proto-verse (Genesis 1:1):
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
We sum in base 10 because we began with base 10 cubes and converted to base 7 because of the Biblical association of Enoch with the number 7.
There's much more to it than this. For example, the Standard value of "God took him" = Hexagon 631 = The precise Hexagon that pairs with Logos Star 373, which is itself formed with 7 Stars of 37:
"God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631
The PERIMETER of Hexagon 631 = 84 = "Enoch" (SH)
Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373
Logos Star 373 = 7 Stars of 37
Enoch = The SEVENTH from Adam
"SEVENTH" (SG) = 391
391 × (37 × 7) = The 37th 3-D Star
We use the first 7 cubes because it yields the prime 3/7 pattern of the Biblical proto-verse (Genesis 1:1):
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
We sum in base 10 because we began with base 10 cubes and converted to base 7 because of the Biblical association of Enoch with the number 7.
There's much more to it than this. For example, the Standard value of "God took him" = Hexagon 631 = The precise Hexagon that pairs with Logos Star 373, which is itself formed with 7 Stars of 37:
"God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631
The PERIMETER of Hexagon 631 = 84 = "Enoch" (SH)
Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373
Logos Star 373 = 7 Stars of 37
Enoch = The SEVENTH from Adam
"SEVENTH" (SG) = 391
391 × (37 × 7) = The 37th 3-D Star
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
Well that's interesting! It is true that the sum of the first 7 triangles is 84. Did you mention that before? If so, I missed it.Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:18 pm I actually did sum the first 7 Triangles and it yields the value of Enoch himsel (84).
But still, it's not a clear motivation to sum cubes. What did you get by summing squares?
Is this your basic research method? Do you have a program that does all these sums so you can quickly scan it for hits? That's the essence of "cherry picking" and I think that's why I often have a hard time seeing these kinds of patterns as "significant."
BTW - if you don't have a program, I could get Grok to write an html/js page real quick. It's written dozens of pages like that for me.
Did you mean "yields" the pattern or "uses" the pattern (i.e. uses the numbers 3 & 7 in the arbitrary combination). You could have tried powers of 7 in base 3, or whatever. You could have summed 3 times mod 7, or any number of other patterns. This is the problem here. It feels like scanning through an infinite set of formulas, functions, number combinations looking for "hits". That's the definition of cherry picking, and it's very difficult to discern between a meaningful "hit' and a random coincidence.Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:18 pm We use the first 7 cubes because it yields the prime 3/7 pattern of the Biblical proto-verse (Genesis 1:1):
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
I think the best thing we should do is see if your PRIMARY RESEARCH is based on any PRINCIPLES that are consistently applied. If we can't do that, then it would be pretty difficult to get a serious mathematician to bother looking at the results.
My philosophy is LESS IS MORE. That's why I've refined the Gen-John stuff down to consistent equations and show Genesis 1:1 is reiteratively structured on the same geometric form of hex/star pairs H(n) x S(n) which are themselves generated by symmetrical self-intersection of a triangle and its mirror image. I find that deep and compelling.
Your sums look like base 7 cubes, not base ten. Am I getting that wrong?Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:18 pm We sum in base 10 because we began with base 10 cubes and converted to base 7 because of the Biblical association of Enoch with the number 7.
2^3 = 8 base 10 and 11 base 7. You listed it as 11 in base 7.
It's very interesting that you found "God took him" = 631 = H(15) and it's perimeter = 84 (Enoch). That's the kind of self-reflectivity that catches my attention.Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 8:18 pm There's much more to it than this. For example, the Standard value of "God took him" = Hexagon 631 = The precise Hexagon that pairs with Logos Star 373, which is itself formed with 7 Stars of 37:
"God took him" (SH) = Hexagon 631
The PERIMETER of Hexagon 631 = 84 = "Enoch" (SH)
Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373
Logos Star 373 = 7 Stars of 37
"SEVENTH" (SG) = 391
391 × (37 × 7) = The 37th 3-D Star
What do you mean when you say that "Hexagon 631 pairs with Logos Star 373"? There are a couple ways to create it from other geometric objects. You can create the star 337 and add 12 T(2) triangles, or you can arrange 7 S(3) stars filled in with 6 H(3) hexagons. How does the 631 hexagon H(15) fit into this scenario? Is there a third way to create it?

Praising God all the day long!
-
SonOfZion232
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2025 4:08 pm
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
Genesis Five - Twenty Three = 283 _ The 61st Prime = 18th Prime ___ {61+18 (79) 22nd Prime (101) 26th Prime (127) 31st Prime (158) = The Most High God}
Verse 129 = 12| Genesis 5:23 = 28 _ (40) 4
And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five=288=18 years: = 599 = 109th Prime = 29th Prime (138) 10th Prime (148) 13 = 4
Verse 283 = 13 |
Verse 61 = 7 |
283 + 61 = Verse 344 = 11|
Verse 18 = 9 |
61 + 18 = Verse 79 = 16 |
Verse 22 = 4 |
79 + 22 = Verse 101 = 2 |
Verse 26 = 8 |
101 + 26 = Verse 127 = 10 |
Verse 31 = 4
127 + 31 = Verse 158 = 14 |
Verse 599 = 23
Verse 109 = 10 |
599 + 109 = Verse 708 = 15 |
Verse 29 = 11 |
109 + 29 = Verse 138 = 12 |
Verse 10 = 1 |
Verse 39 = 12 |
Verse 148 = 13 |
283 + 599 = Verse 882 = 18 |
<><><><>
-
SonOfZion232
- Posts: 188
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2025 4:08 pm
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
A1 - Z26
Genesis Five - Twenty Three = 283 _ The 61st Prime = 18th Prime ___ {61+18 (79) 22nd Prime (101) 26th Prime (127) 31st Prime (158) = The Most High God}
Verse 129 = 12| Genesis 5:23 = 28 _ (40) 4
And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five=288=18 years: = 599 = 109th Prime = 29th Prime (138) 10th Prime (148) 13 = 4
Verse 283 = 13 |
Verse 61 = 7 |
283 + 61 = Verse 344 = 11 |
Verse 18 = 9 |
61 + 18 = Verse 79 = 16 |
Verse 22 = 4 |
79 + 22 = Verse 101 = 2 |
Verse 26 = 8 |
101 + 26 = Verse 127 = 10 |
Verse 31 = 4
127 + 31 = Verse 158 = 14 |
Verse 599 = 23
Verse 109 = 10 |
599 + 109 = Verse 708 = 15 |
Verse 29 = 11 |
109 + 29 = Verse 138 = 12 |
Verse 10 = 1 |
29+10 = Verse 39 = 12 |
138+10 = Verse 148 = 13 |
283 + 599 = Verse 882 = 18 |
<><><><>
Genesis Five - Twenty Three = 283 _ The 61st Prime = 18th Prime ___ {61+18 (79) 22nd Prime (101) 26th Prime (127) 31st Prime (158) = The Most High God}
Verse 129 = 12| Genesis 5:23 = 28 _ (40) 4
And all the days of Enoch were three hundred sixty and five=288=18 years: = 599 = 109th Prime = 29th Prime (138) 10th Prime (148) 13 = 4
Verse 283 = 13 |
Verse 61 = 7 |
283 + 61 = Verse 344 = 11 |
Verse 18 = 9 |
61 + 18 = Verse 79 = 16 |
Verse 22 = 4 |
79 + 22 = Verse 101 = 2 |
Verse 26 = 8 |
101 + 26 = Verse 127 = 10 |
Verse 31 = 4
127 + 31 = Verse 158 = 14 |
Verse 599 = 23
Verse 109 = 10 |
599 + 109 = Verse 708 = 15 |
Verse 29 = 11 |
109 + 29 = Verse 138 = 12 |
Verse 10 = 1 |
29+10 = Verse 39 = 12 |
138+10 = Verse 148 = 13 |
283 + 599 = Verse 882 = 18 |
<><><><>
-
bluetriangle
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Thu Oct 16, 2025 9:28 pm
Re: Was ENOCH the first Biblical Numericist?
Hi Leo.Megiddo wrote: Sun Mar 01, 2026 5:17 pm We know that Enoch is identified as the 7th from Adam. With this in mind, observe that the very name of Enoch is itself a 3-D Triangle (i.e. the sum of the first 7 Triangles):
"Enoch" (SH) = 84
"Enoch" (SH) = (3 × 7) + (3 × 7) + (7 × 3) + (7 × 3)
Enoch = The 7th from Adam
T1 + T2 + T3 + T4 + T5 + T6 + T7 = "Enoch" (SH)
I converted the first 7 cubes to Base 7 and added their values as follows:
1^3 in Base 7 = 1
2^3 in Base 7 = 11
3^3 in Base 7 = 36
4^3 in Base 7 = 121
5^3 in Base 7 = 236
6^3 in Base 7 = 426
7^3 in Base 7 = 1000
Total sum = 1831
Why is this significant? It's the Standard Hebrew value of the key Enoch verse of the Bible!
Genesis 5:24
"And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him"
Genesis 5:24 (SH) = 1831
I reserve judgment on your finding, although it's certainly of interest.
The numbers in these genealogical lists are of interest in themselves and when summed.
Enoch lived for 365 years, this being the 14th centred square. The numbers linked to Enoch (65, 300, 365) sum to 730, the sum of two cubes (1^ + 9^3) and of two squares (1^2 + 27^2).
I always found it intriguing that Methuselah lived to 969 years, this of course being the 17th tetrahedral number and perhaps pointing to 153.
But the real interest, for me, has been taking a running total of the numbers in the list, which continues in Genesis 9 and in fact throughout Genesis. I've tabulated them below, which might be of interest to anyone researching it (bear in mind that in the last verse of Genesis, Joseph's age is repeated, giving 20998).
It contains several patterns. Here's one:
The sum to the 666th verse is 20391 and the sum to the 1529th verse is 20888 (373 x 56). This of course suggests 391 and 888, Yehoshua and Ihsous. These totals also encompass the lives of the three Patriarchs. All four numbers are meaningful in English gematria.
Bill
- Attachments
-
- Genesis Genealogy.png (206.42 KiB) Viewed 1003 times