Read John 3:30 it can also be explained by numbers...
777 is jesus in term of numbers, 999 is john number making them equal by a difference of 111 to attain 888...in a different way (baptism by fire or by water).
Can we stop the upside down thing...we know who is the bad one, I named it 666+37 and it's simple by numbers, it's a heart of wisdom described by alex in reverse yes, all will be revealed soon!
Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
girardlys how long have you been doing Bible codes?
And how many verses have you decoded?
Where is your website with your work?
And how many verses have you decoded?
Where is your website with your work?
Please see here for all abbreviations and new math that you don't understand: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Don't need to talk on the web too much...are you asking for more?Alex wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 11:51 am girardlys how long have you been doing Bible codes?
And how many verses has you decoded?
Where is your website with your work?
If you want nostradamus thing undecoded I'm here (nostradamus century 10 quatrain 19 is about the day after queen EII funeral+1335d ending after day of prayer of "one nation under God in America" made by Trump announcement, if you want to know how cycles are related to time, I'm here,
If you want a verse to be explained I'm here, If you want to know about numbers related to bible and pi and e I'm here too.
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Alright, so I have 15 years of experience with gematria now and I have decoded the verses ordered at 666, 777, 888 & 999.
I was also a noob once but I worked really really hard to get to where I am now. And I decoded verses like a mad man and leveled up that way.
And you don't get to come here and tell me to stop anything as you are a noob compared to me. That is how it is.
I was also a noob once but I worked really really hard to get to where I am now. And I decoded verses like a mad man and leveled up that way.
And you don't get to come here and tell me to stop anything as you are a noob compared to me. That is how it is.
Please see here for all abbreviations and new math that you don't understand: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Hmmm, well, Alex take time, I'm not a detractor of your work...Alex wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 12:06 pm Alright, so I have 15 years of experience with gematria now and I have decoded the verses ordered at 666, 777, 888 & 999.
I was also a noob once but I worked really really hard to get to where I am now. And I decoded verses like a mad man and leveled up that way.
And you don't get to come here and tell me to stop anything as you are a noob compared to me. That is how it is.
My numbers are easy to decode, the truth is as simple as it is...
I respect your work, you are a great worker for the Truth...
I know Peter reject' 3 times Jesus, I prefer your doubts and questions until daylight open your eyes, I'm not worried about the situation.
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
This is not personal, in-fact it's healthy. If Richard did not tell me how it really was when I was here back in 2017 and noobish myself then I would never have learned from it. So I suggest you just try to learn from the conversations here and see how these codes work because you have just seen a bit. This forum has just been reopened.
Please see here for all abbreviations and new math that you don't understand: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
i'm here to learn about/from everyone, it's ok.Alex wrote: Thu Feb 26, 2026 12:19 pm This is not personal, in-fact it's healthy. If Richard did not tell me how it really was when I was here back in 2017 and noobish myself then I would never have learned from it. So I suggest you just try to learn from the conversations here and see how these codes work because you have just seen a bit. This forum has just been reopened.
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
That is good to hear.
Just look at how noob I was once, so I understand the gematria of noobs:
I just laugh when I look at that image. But hey, gematria is a game you level up in.
Just look at how noob I was once, so I understand the gematria of noobs:
Please see here for all abbreviations and new math that you don't understand: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
And look at how wild I was.
This was me when I discovered Illustrator and had my first shot at an industry-grade designer program:
This was me when I discovered Illustrator and had my first shot at an industry-grade designer program:
Please see here for all abbreviations and new math that you don't understand: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/
Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Hi Alex,
What's wrong with mentioning or highlighting something from the Talmud? You act like I was saying the Talmud is divinely inspired or something. There's nothing wrong with quoting from ANY book in a historical context.
May I ask why you always use 1 as the first prime in your "codes" but then turn around and always have 2 as the first prime whenever you use semiprimes? Do you not see the inconsistency there or are you just trolling everyone?
Why would God use mathematical codes to be discovered in our day with 1 as the first prime when professional mathematicians universally say 2 is the first prime? Doesn't God know how primes would be defined during the generation when Biblical codes would be uncovered? I'm pretty sure he does.
I can show how the prime codes in Biblical Numerics are based on 2 being the first prime with straightforward logic. For example, here's a powerful find I made years ago (note that prime/composite numbers are naturally related):
"Jesus" (SH) = 391
"Jesus" (SG) = 888
The composite index of 888 = 733
The 888th composite number = 1068
733 + 888 + 1068 = P(391)
Do you see that? The COMPOSITE IDENTITY of the Standard Greek value of Jesus is literally a PRIME POINTER to the Standard Hebrew value of Jesus.
It gets even better when we look at geometry (something Bill rightfully said is lacking in your work). The natural Hexagon that pairs with T73 is Hexagon 1801. Do you realize what that means?
Observe: 733 + 1068 = 1801
Yes, the natural Hexagon within T73 (i.e. the G 1:1 Triangle) is itself the sum of the composite index of 888 and the 888th composite number, which then points to the 391st prime when we add them to 888!
For the record, the phenomenon of geometric pairing is foundational to Biblical Numerics and was pioneered by the late Vernon Jenkins. The fact that you want to downgrade its significance or importance only exposes you as an incompetent researcher. You also expose yourself when you make stupid claims like 777 being more foundational than 37. How can 37 be a "code" for 777 when 777 is not even a prime and 37 is a prime factor of 777? Obviously it's the other way around: 777 points to 37 (i.e. three sevens), which is THE foundational prime of Biblical Numerics.
Now get out your calculator and add up with me the 24 EVEN rows within the Genesis 1:1 Hexagon of 1801:
1) 26
2) 28
3) 30
4) 32
5) 34
6) 36
7) 38
8) 40
9) 42
10) 44
11) 46
12) 48
13) 48
14) 46
15) 44
16) 42
17) 40
18) 38
19) 36
20) 34
21) 32
22) 30
23) 28
24) 26
Sum of EVEN rows in G 1:1 Hexagon = 888
The EXACT average of those rows = 37
I'll let you figure out what the sum of the ODD rows are. Let's just say they take us all the way back to the beginning (as in the very first Hebrew word of the Bible)
Summary:
1) The composite indentity of 888 = The prime index of 391
2) This composite identity actually forms the G 1:1 Hexagon
3) The even rows of this Hexagon itself = 888 = An exact average of 37 counters per row
Can you present any evidence with straightforward logic (like I did here) to justify the use of 1 as the first prime? I suspect you'll just keep giving us the same incomprehensible mess that nobody can read without getting a massive headache.
Straightforward logic, not your endless manipulations of words/numbers and endless steps to get to something you like.
Leo Tavares (aka Megiddo)
What's wrong with mentioning or highlighting something from the Talmud? You act like I was saying the Talmud is divinely inspired or something. There's nothing wrong with quoting from ANY book in a historical context.
May I ask why you always use 1 as the first prime in your "codes" but then turn around and always have 2 as the first prime whenever you use semiprimes? Do you not see the inconsistency there or are you just trolling everyone?
Why would God use mathematical codes to be discovered in our day with 1 as the first prime when professional mathematicians universally say 2 is the first prime? Doesn't God know how primes would be defined during the generation when Biblical codes would be uncovered? I'm pretty sure he does.
I can show how the prime codes in Biblical Numerics are based on 2 being the first prime with straightforward logic. For example, here's a powerful find I made years ago (note that prime/composite numbers are naturally related):
"Jesus" (SH) = 391
"Jesus" (SG) = 888
The composite index of 888 = 733
The 888th composite number = 1068
733 + 888 + 1068 = P(391)
Do you see that? The COMPOSITE IDENTITY of the Standard Greek value of Jesus is literally a PRIME POINTER to the Standard Hebrew value of Jesus.
It gets even better when we look at geometry (something Bill rightfully said is lacking in your work). The natural Hexagon that pairs with T73 is Hexagon 1801. Do you realize what that means?
Observe: 733 + 1068 = 1801
Yes, the natural Hexagon within T73 (i.e. the G 1:1 Triangle) is itself the sum of the composite index of 888 and the 888th composite number, which then points to the 391st prime when we add them to 888!
For the record, the phenomenon of geometric pairing is foundational to Biblical Numerics and was pioneered by the late Vernon Jenkins. The fact that you want to downgrade its significance or importance only exposes you as an incompetent researcher. You also expose yourself when you make stupid claims like 777 being more foundational than 37. How can 37 be a "code" for 777 when 777 is not even a prime and 37 is a prime factor of 777? Obviously it's the other way around: 777 points to 37 (i.e. three sevens), which is THE foundational prime of Biblical Numerics.
Now get out your calculator and add up with me the 24 EVEN rows within the Genesis 1:1 Hexagon of 1801:
1) 26
2) 28
3) 30
4) 32
5) 34
6) 36
7) 38
8) 40
9) 42
10) 44
11) 46
12) 48
13) 48
14) 46
15) 44
16) 42
17) 40
18) 38
19) 36
20) 34
21) 32
22) 30
23) 28
24) 26
Sum of EVEN rows in G 1:1 Hexagon = 888
The EXACT average of those rows = 37
I'll let you figure out what the sum of the ODD rows are. Let's just say they take us all the way back to the beginning (as in the very first Hebrew word of the Bible)
Summary:
1) The composite indentity of 888 = The prime index of 391
2) This composite identity actually forms the G 1:1 Hexagon
3) The even rows of this Hexagon itself = 888 = An exact average of 37 counters per row
Can you present any evidence with straightforward logic (like I did here) to justify the use of 1 as the first prime? I suspect you'll just keep giving us the same incomprehensible mess that nobody can read without getting a massive headache.
Straightforward logic, not your endless manipulations of words/numbers and endless steps to get to something you like.
Leo Tavares (aka Megiddo)