Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.

[Alex]

inverse α is 1/137.035999206

3599 = middle digits of inverse α = Pri-o(33599 = 316 digits added of φ + 7246 digits added of φ)
= 7 CW of Vs(37) + 7 CW of Vs(73)
= W. from CW in Vs(12777 = 127 (high energy inverse α) merged with 777)

[bluetriangle]

TV = 21784 = perimeter of Hepta(3113 = COG in Tri(37) w. ext...)
FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)
CW = 2691 = (181 = midpoint of the center row in Tri(37))-gonal(6)
FLCW = 7471 = Lucky(868 = (43 = Heptagram(3))-gonal(7) = Three Triangles & Seven Heptagons ordered at 7)

That is called geometry.

And the fact that the FLW connects to the perimeter of Tri(37) while the CW connects to the midpoint of the center row in Tri(37) is pretty incredible.

The FLW is 4780. How does this become 108?

[Alex]

Oh man.... You have to learn some stuff don't you?

108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
Go read the tutorial like everyone else: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/

[Alex]

Just because you refuse to install Windows and use the Number Properties Tool does not give you the benefit to require answers from me all the time.
Get Linux or something.

[RAMcGough]

Just a quick note to draw attention to a new discovery I just made. The image shows all the triangles and centred triangles from letter counts in Genesis 1.1. Each triangle is centred over the word string with that number of letters. For example, words 2, 3 and 4 have ten letters between them, so triangle 10 is centred over word 3.

As you can see, there are 11 triangles and they form a symmetrical pattern of mirrored triangles in the verse, something the winds of chance could not have achieved without a little help from the wind of Spirit. So the mirror of triangle 10 is another triangle of ten counters, over words 6, 5 and 4.

There are three mirrored pairs beginning at words 2 and 6:
triangle 3 (words 2 and 6
triangle 10 (words 2, 3, 4 and words 6, 5, 4).
triangle 15 (words 2, 3, 4, 5 and words 6, 5, 4, 3)

So 2 and 6, suggesting 26 (YHVH) are highlighted.

The total number of counters in all the triangles is 134, which is an alternative spelling of Theos (God) in Greek.

G1.1 Triangles.png

Hi Bill,

I got curious about the triangles you found in Genesis 1.1. My intuition was that the numbers are based on letter counts, which tend to be very small and clustered around the number 4, and so triangles are probably very common. In G1.1 the numbers are 6,3,5,2,5,3,4 so the average is exactly 28/7 = 4 letters per word.

So I wrote a little program to find a thousand verses with seven words (to compare with G1.1) and looked for the ones with the highest number of triangles derived from running sums of letter counts. The winner was 1Ch 2:45 And the son of Shammai was Maon: and Maon was the father of Bethzur. with letter count sequence 3,3,3,5,4,3,3. This yields 14 triangular numbers. Second up is Exodus 25:13 "And thou shalt make staves of shittim wood, and overlay them with gold." with 12 triangles because of its very repetitive letter count 3,3,5,4,3,3,5 which includes 4 words with 3 letters. Third is Psa 50:20 "Thou sittest and speakest against thy brother; thou slanderest thine own mother's son." with 13. Another is Gen 36:8 "Thus dwelt Esau in mount Seir: Esau is Edom." It letter count sequence is 4,3,3,4,3,3,4 and it yields 11 triangles. It is interesting that Gen 7:24 "And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days." letter count 3,4,5,4,2,4,6 has only two triangles but yields 10 running triangular numbers.

Here are the stats I calculated for verses with seven words:

Mean number of triangular sums: 6.13
Standard Deviation 2.28
Median 6

Conclusion: The 9 triangular numbers derived from the running sums of the letter count sequence of Genesis 1:1 is well above average (in the 82nd percentile) but not enough to make me think it is a sign of divine design. The typical letter count between 3-5 makes any "encoding" extremely difficult to differentiate from random noise in this case.

But hey! I could be wrong. I'm open to any correction.

God bless you in your study of God's amazing Word!

[bluetriangle]

Oh man.... You have to learn some stuff don't you?

108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
Go read the tutorial like everyone else: https://777codes.com/index.php/introduc ... -gematria/

No, you're not getting away with that. First you create your own obtuse nomenclature, then you don't use it properly. This is what you wrote.

FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)

FLW = first and last words. Then you have 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)). This makes no sense. You said above that 108-gonal-10 is a polygon with 108 sides, order 10. Yes, I get that. But in your post it becomes

FLW = 4780 = (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10)

What am I supposed to get from (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10), which is actually the perimeter of a 108-gon, as you just said above? Where is the clarity?

Are you trying to make things difficult? I'm willing to work with you and explore whether or not you have a code here, but you are so obtuse in your language (and I appreciate that English isn't your first language) that it's difficult to discern what's going on.

Alex, you have to be as clear as possible all the time. You are not. You fill your posts with numbers that I doubt anyone could even attempt to decipher without going insane. In fact I seriously doubt if anyone has ever done that. You are writing for yourself. The information density is incredible, the terminology is obtuse and there is no real overarching connection. All you are doing is listing numerical properties, and you aren't even doing that very well.

Connecting that fact that the FLW of whatever verse it was is the same as T37 is such a tenuous connection that it isn't worth doing anyway. I'm not trying to be nasty here. I'm trying to wake you up.

[bluetriangle]

Hi Bill,

I got curious about the triangles you found in Genesis 1.1. My intuition was that the numbers are based on letter counts, which tend to be very small and clustered around the number 4, and so triangles are probably very common. In G1.1 the numbers are 6,3,5,2,5,3,4 so the average is exactly 28/7 = 4 letters per word.

Hi Richard.

I hope all is going well with your site-updating efforts.

Your analysis is about what I expected (I've done a little analysis on it too).

However, what's remarkable about the pattern I showed is not the number of triangles found, which as you say is well above average but not enough on its own to raise eyebrows, but the mirroring. I didn't see it myself at first, but that was because I hadn't included the two centred triangles found in the verse by the same method. I see you haven't included them either. Including these two triangles gives a total of eleven triangles, in five pairs, mirrored about the centre of the verse, with T7 in the centre.

The pairs are
T2/T2 in words 2 and 6
T4/T4 over words 2,3,4 and 6,5,4
T5/T5 over words 2,3,4,5 and words 6,5,4,3

The above forms a pattern within the pattern, all involving words 2 and 6 and of course suggesting YHVH. Note that the mirroring is perfect, using the same triangle for each pair.

In addition there are
T3/CT2 in words 1 and 7
T5/CT4 over words 1,2,3,4,5 and words 7,6,5,4,3

This forms the mirrored pattern I showed in my first post and which I've posted again below. I've centered each triangle over the word string that cancels it. So triangle 10 is centred over words 2,3,4 and words 6,5 4.

There's a reason for the mirroring, which I explain in my new book (the version I sent you was before I made this last-minute find).

[Alex]

You refuse to see the design at work here and you even misunderstand things.
And you have the audacity to complain about my language when you were the one swearing here earlier using words like "what the hell" x2 times.

What am I supposed to get from (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10), which is actually the perimeter of a 108-gon, as you just said above? Where is the clarity?

I have never said it is a perimeter of 108-gon. I said 108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
That means that (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10) is still a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
It is the number of sides that connects to the perimeter of Tri(37).

So let me tell you what, I am going to write in my own language now since you are half Nordic and you can learn a bit about the other language that runs through your blood. Use google translate and I am not going to wirte more in Norwegian than this.

Klarer ikke du å forstå at det ytre laget i kodene som blir representert av standard systemet og 1998 I trekant 73 blir koblet til det første og siste ordet (FLW)?
Å at ordinal systemet er koblet til midten igjennom trekant 37 plassert I trekant 73 på grunn av "visdom" (o) = 37?
Er det da så vanskelig å forstå at Gud liker å koble FLW til det ytre laget og CW til midten?

[bluetriangle]

You refuse to see the design at work here and you even misunderstand things.
And you have the audacity to complain about my language when you were the one swearing here earlier using words like "what the hell" x2 times.

What am I supposed to get from (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10), which is actually the perimeter of a 108-gon, as you just said above? Where is the clarity?

I have never said it is a perimeter of 108-gon. I said 108-gonal(10) is a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
That means that (108 = perimeter of Tri(37))-gonal(10) is still a polygon with 108 sides at the order of 10.
It is the number of sides that connects to the perimeter of Tri(37).

I was complaining about your lack of clarity. Anyway, 'hell' is Biblical

So let me tell you what, I am going to write in my own language now since you are half Nordic and you can learn a bit about the other language that runs through your blood. Use google translate and I am not going to wirte more in Norwegian than this.

Klarer ikke du å forstå at det ytre laget i kodene som blir representert av standard systemet og 1998 I trekant 73 blir koblet til det første og siste ordet (FLW)?
Å at ordinal systemet er koblet til midten igjennom trekant 37 plassert I trekant 73 på grunn av "visdom" (o) = 37?
Er det da så vanskelig å forstå at Gud liker å koble FLW til det ytre laget og CW til midten?

That's no less understandable than the rest of what you write. You want me to take a tutorial your terminology. Why should I? You have never given me any reason to learn it, because you have never shown that you have a code. There is the odd bit and piece here and there, and you are to be commended for that. But the bulk of it is nothing more than a database of numerical and geometric properties, with random links between the numbers, and systems that you seem to invent as you go along. I'm still waiting for you to show me an actual code.

I'll tell you what: show me your very best evidence.

[RAMcGough]

Hi Richard.

I hope all is going well with your site-updating efforts.

Thanks! It has been strangely difficult. I've been working with software for many years, but keep bumping into issues that slow me down. Feels like I'm jogging in mud. I don't know if its spiritual opposition or God teaching me to rely on Him rather than my own strength and understanding. It's probably the latter.

Your analysis is about what I expected (I've done a little analysis on it too).

That's what I like about your approach.

However, what's remarkable about the pattern I showed is not the number of triangles found, which as you say is well above average but not enough on its own to raise eyebrows, but the mirroring. I didn't see it myself at first, but that was because I hadn't included the two centred triangles found in the verse by the same method. I see you haven't included them either. Including these two triangles gives a total of eleven triangles, in five pairs, mirrored about the centre of the verse, with T7 in the centre.

The pairs are
T2/T2 in words 2 and 6
T4/T4 over words 2,3,4 and 6,5,4
T5/T5 over words 2,3,4,5 and words 6,5,4,3

The above forms a pattern within the pattern, all involving words 2 and 6 and of course suggesting YHVH. Note that the mirroring is perfect, using the same triangle for each pair.

Yes, the mirroring of the letter counts is intriguing. 4 3 5 2 5 3 6 I think this is part of the infinite beauty of the first verse.

The central five letter counts forms a palindrome 3 5 2 5 3 which is striking since the primary structure is based on the palindromic primes 37/73 and mirror symmetry is very important in the geometric derivation of those numbers as the self-intersection of T(10) = 55 and it's reflection.

In addition there are
T3/CT2 in words 1 and 7
T5/CT4 over words 1,2,3,4,5 and words 7,6,5,4,3

This forms the mirrored pattern I showed in my first post and which I've posted again below. I've centered each triangle over the word string that cancels it. So triangle 10 is centred over words 2,3,4 and words 6,5 4.

There's a reason for the mirroring, which I explain in my new book (the version I sent you was before I made this last-minute find).

I think my problem is that I don't see any meaning in merely collecting triangles. It reminds me of the Game of Four Fours, where the goal is to express every natural number as a combination of four fours. E.g.

1 = (4x4)/(4x4),
2 = (4x4)/(4+4)
3 = (4+4+4)/4

etc.

I get the same feeling from John Elias' book "Proof of God" - he finds a way to express almost every number in terms of hexagon symmetry. The problem is we can write almost any number that way. He starts with the hexagon/star sequences and then adds or removes dots to get the number he wants. For example, 6 = non-centered hexagon, 7 = centered hexagon, 13 = star, 12 = star with central dot removed, etc., etc., etc. Is there any number that can't be expressed this way?

In any case, I really appreciate your thoughtful responses and look forward to talking more.

God bless you!

Richard