Re: Mirrored Triangles in Genesis 1.1.
Posted: Thu Feb 19, 2026 2:10 am
Alex, you have created your own language. What the hell does PP-o mean?Alex wrote: Wed Feb 18, 2026 1:52 pm Oh but I can do better than that with standard geometry:
2701 = PP-o(37273 = Happy-o(251426 = Tri(181) + Tri(685))) + Tri(38 = code number for 888)
181 = midpoint of the center row in Tri(37)
685 = midpoint of the center row in Tri(73)
And saying 38 is code for 888 is stretching it too far
You are the one making this a competition. Real codes add to each other to make a greater whole. There IS no competition. We're all meant to be on the same team.
I show you fundamental geometry, all emanating from numbers within Genesis 1.1, building into the most important announcement of all time, and you reject it all and give me some paper-thin arguments and dubious connections, with no overall message that you will reveal, other than "God likes dimensionless constants".
]Using real Triangles.
What are you saying, that centred triangles aren't real? Isosceles triangles?
Because it's obviously important to the Encoder. So it should be important to us too. Star 925 comes from a centred triangle. Centred triangles 901, 1585 and several more are made use of in Genesis 1.1. This is important. It's not a bloody competition! I'm trying to teach you some of what I know to help you and everyone else in your own work. It doesn't take away from anything you have or anyone else has. It only adds.So why should I use alternative geometry here?