Greetings Craig,

Thank you for the extra details.

I have been reading Dr. Bluer's webpages for many years now.

I'd had a hiatus of a few years before checking in on his work again about three months ago.

It was there that I saw his adaptations of your findings.

His webpages are excellent resources.

Top marks to you yet again for getting in touch with Dr. Bluer.

Dr. Bluer has done an admirable job in adapting the work of the researcher Boulay.

I never understood Boulay until I read Bluer.

Now, when I look at Boulay's own webpages, his work is easy to understand.

Boulay has found amazingly integrated numerical patterns in the genetic code involving the integers 7, 11, and 13.

However, his main contribution is, I believe, his hypothesis concerning proline.

It really is quite brilliant, and I think it is a step above and beyond Shcherbak's proline hypothesis.

The net result of Boulay's proline hypothesis is a total of 1147 atoms constituting the 64 codons.

1147 = 31 x 37, this number featuring prominently on the NJ cube and the Star of Israel.

In fact, it features no less than three times symmetrically on both.

Further, Dr. Bluer points out the significance of these two prime factors.

37 is the key prime signifier of Genesis 1:1 = 37 x 73.

31 is the key prime signifier of John 1:1 = 3 x 13 x 31 x 3.

Dr. Bluer has also done further work with Shcherbak's patterns.

This work can be viewed at youtube under Dr. Peter Bluer's name.

I particularly like the way in which he summarised Shcherbak's fourth and fifth patterns.

It becomes evident that the combined nucleon total for the fourth pattern sums to 4588.

4588 = 2 x 2 x 31 x 37.

The factors 31 and 37 are once more present.

Further, the total nucleon sum for the fifth pattern is 3330.

This number appears gematrically in two places in the Bible of which I'm aware.

The first place is at 1 Peter 2:6 (one of my favourite chapters of the Bible).

The adapted Isaianic quote reads: idou tithemi en Sion lithon akrogoniaion = "Behold, I set up in Zion a chief corner stone."

This excerpt sums to 3330, and has no textual variants of which I am aware.

The second excerpt comes from 1 John 1:7.

Here, the numerical evidence heavily favours the TR rendering over the NA27/UBS version.

It is a complex numerical entity, as, indeed, is the entire verse.

The excerpt reads: to haima Iesou Christou tou huiou = "The blood of Jesus Christ the Son."

The total for the excerpt is 4440, with the underlined Christ the Son summing to 3330.

It is worth looking at the numerical structure of this excerpt.

The first word, to, sums to 370.

The next two words, haima Iesou, sum to 740.

Thus, the next two words have twice the value of the first word.

The first three words, to haima Iesou, sum to 1110.

The power set for these three words sums to 3330.

The last three words, Christou tou huiou, sum to 3330.

Thus, the last three words have three times the value of the first three words.

There is an extremely tight organisation ordering this excerpt.

It revolves around the number 37, or 370.

But that is not all!

In discussing this phenomenon with Richard, it came to his attention that the number 31 also plays a leading role in the latter portion of this verse.

Allied to this was my own investigation of the entire verse.

The number 37 plays a leading role in its organisation.

It intersects with the number 31 at exactly the place which I have excerpted.

From there, the number 31 plays the organising role to the end of the verse.

If interested, you can find some of the details at the link, below.

http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?t=68
A final point is worth mentioning in relation to Dr. Bluer's videos at youtube.

He includes a video excerpt in which the director of CERN is being interviewed.

The director states that there are 37 blueprints whereby energy 'knows' how to become matter.

With these 37 blueprints, physicists believe they can explain all of physical reality.

If true, I wonder what these 37 blueprints are.

Returning now to the content of your email.

I received from Vernon a link wherein the molecular weights of the 20 canonical AAs are given to the fourth decimal.

These are the figures Dr. Bluer has in his spreadsheet.

It would seem that they are even more accurate than the figures obtained from Wikipedia.

What remains is the convergence of the combined molecular weight on the number 2738.

The amended value of 2378.0169 is of interest for the fact that the first decimal place holder has no value.

This fact dictates that the integer 2738 is, for all intents and purposes, the figure that one should be working with.

Nonetheless, with each rounded to the second decimal - as at Wikipedia - the combined molecular weight of the 20 canonical AAs is 2738.00.

It is my conviction that this phenomenon ought to be incorporated into the findings thus far.

(How much genuine value is actually added by going to four decimal places anyway?

It might be useful for some[?], but rounding to two decimal places, as at Wikipedia, seems preferable, at least to me.

The only proviso would be that the process of rounding to two decimals has been used.)

Dr. Bluer has rejigged Rakocevic's 4 x 5 template of the 20 AAs to good effect.

He has a penchant for that kind of thing.

He discovered some interesting patterns from Shcherbak's work, too.

However, as I recall, these did not allow for Boulay's proline hypothesis, so I had to somewhat reluctantly lay them aside.

Boulay's work is far too detailed and beautiful in its symmetry for it not to be correct.

This time, I think Dr. Bluer might be on to something.

The pink and green celled diagram looks promising.

The numbers are very close to exact, and are therefore indexical of design.

The grid shows a pleasing symmetry in its appearance.

However, to my mind, the yellow and purple celled diagram, while close, is too inexact to consider using.

The numbers converge on 1997 and 741 rather than on 1998 and 740, and so must be reckoned as a near miss rather than a match.

The next question that needs to be asked concerns the allocation of the AAs in the grid.

Why are the AAs aligned in this manner?

What properties dictate their distribution in this manner?

I think this question needs to be answered before the findings can be presented.

Otherwise, the findings might be reckoned as mere number juggling rather than anything intrinsic to the 20 AAs themselves or their properties.

Vernon asked me this very question, and I replied that I'd like to know the answer to that question myself.

I can tell you mine and Vernon's prayers are with you in this work of yours, Craig.

You have unearthed the first realworld application for the numbers Vernon has discovered in Genesis 1:1.

I could say the same thing in relation to the numbers I have discovered concerning the 12 sons of Israel.

They map beautifully onto the work you have discovered in relation to the genetic code.

The mapping is so exact in places that coincidence, as in happenstance, has to be ruled out.

I know you concur with this view.

All good wishes and blessings as you pursue this work, Craig.

I look forward eagerly to the next turn in this tale.

Stephen

## Bookmarks