Google Ads

Google Ads

Bible Wheel Book

Google Ads

+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 10 12345 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 92

Thread: Jacob-to-Joseph

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855

    Jacob-to-Joseph

    Jacob-to-Joseph: When you read Genesis you conclude that the order of generations is from Abraham-20 to Isaac-21
    to Jacob-22 to Joseph: but no, that first Joseph was NOT in the line of Christ, and neither is the Joseph who was husband to Mary.

    The name Joseph means "the LORD will add a son" -- and the name Jacob means 'supplanted", (to take the place of) Gen27:36.

    But, , the Jacob to Joseph in Mt 1:16 really are a father-to-son which leads to Jesus -- the 'supplanter' Jacob is the key!

    His coat-of-many-colors was a precept of how Jesus came in a "body prepared", in a garment (vesture) dipped in blood, as a saviour to all races and colors of mankind. As Jacob wore the Esau disguise, so Jesus came looking like mankind!
    Last edited by duxrow; 04-26-2014 at 05:15 AM.
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    Book of Ruth ends with Boaz, Obed, Jesse, David (Grandpa, Dad, Son, Grandson), and the Book of Isaiah begins with Uzziah, Jotham, Ahaz, Hezekiah (4 generations, father-to-son).

    The final-4 in Matthew 1:16 are Jacob, Joseph, Mary, Jesus -- and note that every name from Adam to Jesus is different (no repeats like in Luke) EXCEPT for the name of Jacob (means 'supplanter', to take the place of..) and there are only two (2) "Joseph son of Jacob" in the Bible!
    Could be that Bush41, Clinton, Bush43, Obama are a Harbinger of good things to come? (Fig. of Speech: sarcasm)..
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    It was during Hezekiah's reign that the ten tribes of the Northern Kingdom (Israel) was carried away by the King of Assyria..
    2Kings 18:11 And the king of Assyria did carry away Israel unto Assyria, and put them in Halah and in Habor by the river of Gozan, and in the cities of the Medes: 18:12 Because they obeyed not the voice of the LORD their God, but transgressed his covenant, and all that Moses the servant of the LORD commanded, and would not hear them, nor do them.
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    Hezekiah's PASSOVER was compared to the times of the Judges and Kings. 2Kings 23:22.

    Josiah's PASSOVER was compared to Samuel's, 2Chr35:18. On the heels of the Judges Period, or we could say 'betwixt' the Judges and the Kings..

    The DIFFERENCE might explain why the "Jesus" PASSOVER had Him eating before the killing! You think?
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    They had to choose their lamb on the 10th day of the 1st month (whatever day of the week..), then on the 14th they were to kill it, and the day following was the first day of Unleavened Bread and a High Sabbath (Holy Convocation, Lev23:7), which called for them to remove all traces of leaven.

    Works out that the 10th would be a Regular Sabbath ..
    Name:  3D3N.gif
Views: 32
Size:  29.8 KB
    Last edited by duxrow; 08-08-2014 at 12:39 PM.
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    Only two Jacob's in the Bible, and both of them had a son named Joseph. Since Jacob means "supplanted" (to take the place of..), maybe there's a connection?

    The Genesis Jacob had 12 sons, but the other Jacob, in Matt 1:16, only one recorded.. Sooo ?

    Gen27:36 KJV "And he [Esau] said, Is not he rightly named Jacob? for he hath supplanted me these two times: he took away my birthright; and, behold, now he hath taken away my blessing"..WRONG! Esau was a liar and profane fornicator! Heb12:16
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    Oh yeah, the CONNECTION is that the Joseph in Genesis was NOT in the pedigree of Jesus, and neither is the husband of Mary! Besides, that 2nd Jacob(Gen#63) is a correlate to the 2nd Enoch(Gen#7) and the 2nd Lamech(Gen#9). The cryptogram: 7x9=63
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Enschede / Netherlands
    Posts
    2,620
    Quote Originally Posted by duxrow View Post
    Only two Jacob's in the Bible, and both of them had a son named Joseph. Since Jacob means "supplanted" (to take the place of..), maybe there's a connection?

    The Genesis Jacob had 12 sons, but the other Jacob, in Matt 1:16, only one recorded.. Sooo ?

    Maybe the two Jacobs of Matthew have to be understood as one and the same Jacob, father of both Judah and Joseph.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Enschede / Netherlands
    Posts
    2,620
    Quote Originally Posted by duxrow View Post
    Only two Jacob's in the Bible, and both of them had a son named Joseph. Since Jacob means "supplanted" (to take the place of..), maybe there's a connection?

    The Genesis Jacob had 12 sons, but the other Jacob, in Matt 1:16, only one recorded.. Sooo ?

    Maybe the two Jacobs of Matthew have to be understood as one and the same "supplanter", father of both Judah and Joseph.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,855
    Quote Originally Posted by sylvius View Post
    Maybe the two Jacobs of Matthew have to be understood as one and the same "supplanter", father of both Judah and Joseph.
    Negative, Sylvie, it emphasizes the Father-to-Son Generations through the OT (because Adam was first) and then Father-to-Daughter in NT, where gender not an issue, as per Gal 3:28.

    [ Purpose of OT was to bring forth the Promised Seed/Son JESUS, and now the NT is emphasizing the 'Fruitful' females; B]Trees of Righteousness[/B]!
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •