rdelmonico

01-18-2014, 05:26 AM

If we start with 2 dimensions and we look at an image that has width and height, (the image on the front of a quarter or a penny).

We don't know that there is also an image on the reverse side. This could be a glimpse into the spiritual world. Then we introduce looping time.

By spinning the coin. We can see both sides of the coin if it is spinning at a specific rate.

The angle at which we are looking is also important.

Now our perception of reality is altered, we see an image that was hidden from view.

The nature of time will prove to be very important in seeing into the spiritual realm.

We may have to step this up several dimensions to get to the true nature of reality, (see: Richard Feynman why all electrons are exactly alike).

Could it be that particles are like letters of an alphabet, or is it a computation representing a letter?

In the twin astronaut the only difference was, the astronaut accelerated and decelerated.

If the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion then the only real difference between them is entropy.

In the alphabet model, we run into the problem of infinities.

In the computer model, there are no infinities, only specific rules governed by the software.

https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/physics/

The next serious question is about the confinement mechanism – what keeps these “bubbles in space-time” from simply dissipating? What holds them together? I propose a balancing of forces: the extreme inelasticity of space with an incredible internal temporal pressure wave. The elasticity of space can be calculated with a couple assumptions: Y0 = ħ/2lPtP ≈ 6.0526 *1043 N. If elementary particles are Planck-sized objects, they must have internal pressure that balances that extreme force. I propose a spherical standing wave of temporal curvature – much like an onion in terms of structure. The rest energy of elementary particles is small but pack that energy into a very small space and you have a good candidate for the confinement mechanism. Again, the issue here is not the why of ten elementary particles. I believe that why can be answered when we fully understand temporal curvature and appreciate the impedance of space.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_time_dimensions

Theories with more than one dimension of time have sometimes been advanced in physics, whether as a serious description of reality or just as a curious possibility. Itzhak Bars's work on "two-time physics",[3] inspired by the SO(10,2) symmetry of the extended supersymmetry structure of M-theory, is the most recent and systematic development of the concept (see also F-theory). Walter Craig and Steven Weinstein proved the existence of a well-posed initial value problem for the ultrahyperbolic equation (wave equation in more than one time dimension).[4] This showed that initial data on a mixed (spacelike and timeline) hypersurface obeying a particular nonlocal constraint evolves deterministically in the remaining time dimension.

We don't know that there is also an image on the reverse side. This could be a glimpse into the spiritual world. Then we introduce looping time.

By spinning the coin. We can see both sides of the coin if it is spinning at a specific rate.

The angle at which we are looking is also important.

Now our perception of reality is altered, we see an image that was hidden from view.

The nature of time will prove to be very important in seeing into the spiritual realm.

We may have to step this up several dimensions to get to the true nature of reality, (see: Richard Feynman why all electrons are exactly alike).

Could it be that particles are like letters of an alphabet, or is it a computation representing a letter?

In the twin astronaut the only difference was, the astronaut accelerated and decelerated.

If the past, present and future is only a stubbornly persistent illusion then the only real difference between them is entropy.

In the alphabet model, we run into the problem of infinities.

In the computer model, there are no infinities, only specific rules governed by the software.

https://www.msu.edu/~micheal/physics/

The next serious question is about the confinement mechanism – what keeps these “bubbles in space-time” from simply dissipating? What holds them together? I propose a balancing of forces: the extreme inelasticity of space with an incredible internal temporal pressure wave. The elasticity of space can be calculated with a couple assumptions: Y0 = ħ/2lPtP ≈ 6.0526 *1043 N. If elementary particles are Planck-sized objects, they must have internal pressure that balances that extreme force. I propose a spherical standing wave of temporal curvature – much like an onion in terms of structure. The rest energy of elementary particles is small but pack that energy into a very small space and you have a good candidate for the confinement mechanism. Again, the issue here is not the why of ten elementary particles. I believe that why can be answered when we fully understand temporal curvature and appreciate the impedance of space.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_time_dimensions

Theories with more than one dimension of time have sometimes been advanced in physics, whether as a serious description of reality or just as a curious possibility. Itzhak Bars's work on "two-time physics",[3] inspired by the SO(10,2) symmetry of the extended supersymmetry structure of M-theory, is the most recent and systematic development of the concept (see also F-theory). Walter Craig and Steven Weinstein proved the existence of a well-posed initial value problem for the ultrahyperbolic equation (wave equation in more than one time dimension).[4] This showed that initial data on a mixed (spacelike and timeline) hypersurface obeying a particular nonlocal constraint evolves deterministically in the remaining time dimension.