PDA

View Full Version : A Challenge for CWH



Richard Amiel McGough
07-22-2012, 06:16 PM
CWH has repeatedly posted false assertions on this forum and when I point them out to him, he runs and hides and refuses to answer. Then he posts more false assertions, and when I prove him wrong he runs and hides and refuses to answer. So I collected up a few of his recent offenses and asked him to answer and he did as he always does. He ran and hid and refused to answer. Here is the post that he needs to answer (from post #76 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell&p=47473#post47473) in the thread The Simplest Cell (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell)):

================================================== =======
============= CHALLENGE TO CHEOW WEE HOCK=====================
================================================== =======


I have asked a simple question but instead receive a long reply unrelated to my request. The question is :

Oh, so you want to act like the Cleverbot (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3243-AI-Cleverbot-ain-t-so-clever) again? That ain't so clever, my friend. When the Cleverbot gets stumped it starts robotically mimicking the human. That's what you are doing right now. You have refused to answer many of my questions no matter how many times I ask. You evade, dodge, falsely claim that you did answer, and change the subject. So now in your mindless robotic brain you think you are going to throw all that back in my face and pretend that I'm the one who refuses to answer questions? Fat chance.

I would be happy to answer your questions after you demonstrate that you are not just a Cleverbot. Here is what you need to do:

1) Admit that you were wrong in post #58 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell&p=47425#post47425) of this thread when you falsely asserted that the scientific report implied "500 million year old genes and no mutations." I have brought this to your attention twice and you have refused to acknowledge the question, let alone admit your error.

2) Answer my questions about the video link I posted in post #11 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell&p=47118#post47118). I repeated the same questions four times but you refused to answer. Here is how I presented the questions in post #33 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell&p=47209#post47209):
What was the conclusion stated in the video?

What evidence did the scientists give to support their conclusion?

Is their conclusion supported by the evidence? If not, why not?

Please try to answer those questions with some semblance of intelligence.

3) You recently challenged me to answer a 90 minute creationist video after you refused to respond to the answers I had already given to the 9 minute video you posted in post #75 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3176-What-s-the-best-evidence-for-evolution&p=46949#post46949) of the What's the Best Evidence for Evolution? (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3176-What-s-the-best-evidence-for-evolution) thread. In post #82 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3176-What-s-the-best-evidence-for-evolution&p=46962#post46962) of that thread I showed that the video was produced by creationist liars, frauds, and deceivers. So if you want me to answer another video or any other question you present, you must first respond to the answers I have already given.

4) Demonstrate that you have any knowledge of evolution at all by presenting the best evidence for the theory in the thread called What's the Best Evidence for Evolution? (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3176-What-s-the-best-evidence-for-evolution).

5) Admit that you have been deliberately evading these questions that I have been repeating over and over and over again. I collected them all together earlier in post #59 (http://www.biblewheel.com/forum/showthread.php?3217-The-Simplest-Cell&p=47426#post47426) of this thread and you ignored them all as usual. Then you tried to cover your tracks by changing the subject. Your behavior is making me think that you really are a Cleverbot. I'm not joking. I am seriously considering the possibility that I'm being hoaxed by some "clever" programmers who want to see how long it will take me to figure it out. You show no signs of any human awareness at all. You write like you are a machine that does not understand context, meaning, or trains of thought. If you are human, then please try to demonstrate this by responding intelligently to what I am saying to you.

Thanks!

:sunny:

CWH
07-22-2012, 07:17 PM
What challenge is this when you can't even answer my simple question which I am the first to insist that the thread will not move on unless this question is answered. This is the question again which I would lie to hear from RAM:

What are the flaws which evolutionists admit in the Theory of Evolution?

This is my post in relation to the issue at hand:


I have asked a simple question but instead receive a long reply unrelated to my request. The question is :

What do evolutionists think are the Flaws in the Theory of Evolution? Is it wrong to ask this rational question so that we can understand the thinking behind the evolutionists? To seek the truth, one must see perspectives and issues in both ways. To say that the theory of Evolution have no flaw is totally BIASED. I do admit that creationism have some flaws such as the timing but will the evolutionists do likewise and admit their flaws? And when I asked why so many critics against the theory of evolution and the answer that RAM gave was they were all brainwashed and are liars etc. Why would they lie? What gain are they after? Many are the same as me questioning to find out the truth of the theory of evolution same as Rose and RAM questioning the bible God.

God Blessed.:pray:

Richard Amiel McGough
07-22-2012, 08:31 PM
What challenge is this when you can't even answer my simple question which I am the first to insist that the thread will not move on unless this question is answered. This is the question again which I would lie to hear from RAM:

What are the flaws which evolutionists admit in the Theory of Evolution?

This is my post in relation to the issue at hand:


What do evolutionists think are the Flaws in the Theory of Evolution? Is it wrong to ask this rational question so that we can understand the thinking behind the evolutionists? To seek the truth, one must see perspectives and issues in both ways. To say that the theory of Evolution have no flaw is totally BIASED. I do admit that creationism have some flaws such as the timing but will the evolutionists do likewise and admit their flaws? And when I asked why so many critics against the theory of evolution and the answer that RAM gave was they were all brainwashed and are liars etc. Why would they lie? What gain are they after? Many are the same as me questioning to find out the truth of the theory of evolution same as Rose and RAM questioning the bible God.

God Blessed.:pray:
There you go again! Trying to dodge by changing the subject. I already told you I would be happy to answer the new questions you are asking after you reply to the posts that you have refused to answer.

Obviously, it would be absurd for me to waste my time answering again if you refuse to respond to my previous answers. Everyone knows that you will just ignore my answers. It is vain talking to you because you ignore what I say ... and then post more mindless crap that is easily refuted.

And as for your "brilliant" idea of evolutionists posting the "problems" with evolution - a discussion like that is only appropriate for intelligent and mature people who are truly seeking truth. You do not qualify because you have proven over and over again that you have no desire for the truth. That's why you can't even state the best evidence for evolution. My test is designed to discern between truth seekers and closed-minded ignorant ideologues like you. Anyone who is authentically seeking truth KNOWS that the first step is to understand the position that they are rejecting! This is the most elementary fact. Yet you refuse, and so you reveal that you have no desire for truth. You want to discuss the "problems" merely so you can have more "problems" for your "list" even as you remain TOTALLY IGNORANT of the most basic facts of the science of evolution. Only an idiot would play such a game with you.

You need to answer the questions with intelligence. Don't you realize what your refusal says about you?

Richard Amiel McGough
09-04-2012, 09:56 AM
Well, CWH has begun his campaign of copying and pasting mindless crap from corrupt creationist sites again, so it's time to remind him that he left a little "unfinished business" from his previous postings.

Perhaps we should have a poll. Does anyone think that CWH will have the integrity to answer?

CWH
09-05-2012, 07:47 AM
Well, CWH has begun his campaign of copying and pasting mindless crap from corrupt creationist sites again, so it's time to remind him that he left a little "unfinished business" from his previous postings.

Perhaps we should have a poll. Does anyone think that CWH will have the integrity to answer?

You never learnt do you? Polls are useless in this forum because only a few handful will respond which doesn't represent the majority. I set up the debate knowing that the debate between evolutionist and creationist will never end so as to wake up a sleepy forum. I don't care a damn about my reputation if I can save a soul or champion for the truth; dont waste your precious time. Did Jesus cared about His reputation despite being mocked? Evolutionists will say crap to creationists and Creationists will say crap to evolutionists but one day the truth will be known.

God Bless Creationism.:pray:

Richard Amiel McGough
09-05-2012, 07:50 AM
You never learnt do you? Polls are useless in this forum because only a few handful will respond which doesn't represent the majority. I set up the debate knowing that the debate between evolutionist and creationist will never end so as to wake up a sleepy forum. I don't care a damn about my reputation if I can save a soul or champion for the truth; dont waste your precious time. Did Jesus cared about His reputation despite being mocked? Evolutionists will say crap to creationists and Creationists will say crap to evolutionists but one day the truth will be known.

God Bless Creationism.:pray:

In other words, you won't admit you are wrong no matter how much evidence proves it.

So much for the "high morals" of Christians! :lmbo: