As you can see, the site is no longer down. ;)

The server for this site crashed a couple weeks ago and the the company hosting it said all their backups were corrupted, so it has taken some time for me to reconstruct it from my personal backups. I moved to a new host and have restored full functionality to the Full Text Bible Database (the most popular feature of this site) and most of the articles relating to my old research on the Bible Wheel.  I also have gotten this blog up and running (obviously) though I’ve lost the posts written after 2014 and many of the graphics in the articles are missing. I have yet to restore the forum. My latest backup contains all the posts up to November 2014. I hope to restore it tomorrow.

Please leave a comment if you encounter any errors so I can fix them.

Thank you for your patience!

Posted in Bible Wheel
6 comments on “As you can see, the site is no longer down. ;)
  1. Anne says:

    Yay! Thank you so much, Richard. Glad to see it’s back up.

  2. Glad to be of service Anne. But this blog is still out of date (it will take a bit of work to restore posts that were lost in the crash). And the forum is still down. But most folks don’t seem very interested in those features. The Bible Database is what they like most. So I’m thinking of designing a brand new shiny version that takes advantage of all the advances in web technology since 2007 when I designed it.

    Stay tuned!

    PS: Let me know if there are any features you’d like me to add.

  3. Laura Askins says:

    Hi Richard,

    I came across your site, in my writing for an Astrology software company as an alleged expert on Sabian Symbols which is also a wheel of symbols. I completely get your disillusion to your own previous beliefs, I’ve done the same with my own work. Though I’m more inclined to see personal blunders as necessary steps in the process of wisdom attainment… an unending process. At our more material Earth level perfect cosmic accuracy whether by ancient Bible scribes and authors or those of us trying to make sense of a God code in our now, I don’t think is possible. I am glad though you put your best effort forward even if it was flawed!

    The symbol in question I’m writing on leading me to your site is 16 Capricorn/17 Benjamin ‘Boys and girls in gymnasium suits’ Besides the obvious implications of physical sport/exercise, the Greek gymnasium led to schools and collages etc. I saw this symbol at higher levels as the pattern for Gematria numerical values, how bodies and minds and other manifestations are coded from the hierarchy. Especially when seen with its opposition. 16 Cancer/18 Gad ‘A man before a square a manuscript in front of him’. Essentially everyone has a unique manuscript or life path aligned with a body. Dr. Hurtak ‘Keys of Enoch’ goes into details of Gematria and Zohar bodies etc.

    I would like to quote some of the more simpler concepts of the Gematria system, your thoughts in my work. Like you I’m aware that whatever I write now may need revision later down the road when I have grown. Nevertheless I have taken the stance all stepping stones to revelation are necessary and where ever I’m at now might appeal to someone at that point on their path.

    My spiritual beliefs are broad and I take the best of what world religions, science and my personal experiences has to offer in an all inclusive custom belief of God. But like you if better info crosses my path I’m the first to apologize and let it gently go, that way I’m always learning more and not getting stuck in a rut!

    Thank you for your web site,

  4. Ratu O Natewa says:

    Dear Richard,

    Thank you very much for maintaining the Bible Database website. Much appreciated. All the mathematical results therein can be verified mathematically using other techniques based on Number Theory applied to Biblical Numerology developed by Dr. Steven Jones in his book “The Biblical Meaning of Numbers from One to Forty.”

    In others words, we have now a different methodology to prove that your work is mathematically correct.

    Thank you once again for the amazing work you have developed over the years.

    Kind regards,

    Ratu O Natewa

  5. Hi Ratu,

    I appreciate your comments. I would be interested to know what “techniques based on Number Theory” you are using, and how they “verify” the results I found. OF course, there’s a difference between being “mathematically correct” and “meaninful.” I’m pretty sure all my results were correct in a mathematical sense. The problem was that I cherry picked results which created the illusion of meaning when none existed.

    If you want to have an in-depth discussion of these issues, I would invite you to join my forum:

    All the best,


  6. Neels de Wet says:

    I would like to share my addition to your Joh1:1 wheel.
    Thank you for a wonderful insight on this site, and now my passion of Gematria is giving me so much more in depth revelation.

    Where can I share this for your review?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *