Google Ads

Google Ads

Bible Wheel Book

Google Ads

+ Reply to Thread
Page 9 of 13 FirstFirst ... 5678910111213 LastLast
Results 81 to 90 of 123
  1. #81
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    147
    As per Biblewheel:

    Ark of God , " Arun Elohim " = 343 = ( 73 )

    Holy Ark " Arun HaKadosh " = 666

    343 occurs at position 666 in Pi

    {...901224953430146549585...}

    Name:  spock-orly-o.gif
Views: 73
Size:  806.3 KB ...gotta be combinatorics
    Last edited by Snakeboy; 04-14-2014 at 08:34 PM.

  2. #82
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    147
    Seems pretty uncanny, that reciprocal relationship with the gematria values for the names of the ark , in pi , are what they are, what with Gen 1:1's value having the position numbers summing to 666 ( are there more values for the ark/s, btw ? )

    I noticed something after extracting the roots from some of the position numbers of these gematria sums in pi, this is only a little, think it's right

    Name:  1112.JPG
Views: 70
Size:  55.4 KB

    Also, Richard, is there any way to search for all verse numbers that would be based on a simple set, like { 541, 514, 451, 415, 154, 145 }, or { 15:45, 54:15.. } ?, or a way to bring up all verses sequentially based on multiples of 144, or other integers ?

    Thanks, hope things are good on your end

  3. #83
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    17

    Gettin' "Creative" with 666

    Hiya Snakeboy;

    This, from you, is interestin':

    Quote Originally Posted by Snakeboy View Post
    As per Biblewheel:

    Ark of God , " Arun Elohim " = 343 = ( 73 )

    Holy Ark " Arun HaKadosh " = 666

    343 occurs at position 666 in Pi

    {...901224953430146549585...}
    I been playin with Genesis chapter 1 and found this:

    Name:  10 creative utterances.PNG
Views: 69
Size:  22.4 KB

    We have 2 constants linked to the 10 creative utterances of god; and that scary 666 thing associated
    with the destruction of that "old creation" followed by a "new creation". That 4000 is kinda neat as a
    round number.

    Krakers
    Knave works His pet jokes.

  4. #84
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    147
    Neato, Krackers

    I haven't really played around too much with Genesis 1:1, mainly sticking to reading the debates about it's numerical contents.

    It's obviously a specifically chosen set, or elements from a larger set...imo, of course.

    I look forward to trying to crack it

    Something else I have found for these numbers in Pi, at least what I have checked out so far, is that in the case of certain numbers, in pi, the integer itself added to the position number seems, give a product that is an element in the set of " combinations " of another integer.

    For example:

    111 and 1117 both start at the 153rd place, after the decimal

    ( 1117 + 153 ) = 1270

    I have not done an exhaustive study into this, so I cannot say it's true in all cases, however, in that case, ( 1117 and 153 ) I feel fine in saying the product is identical to an integer in the set of combinations based around the integer 2701 ( an intersection between sets )

    After extracting the roots of the position numbers, in pi, of some of these integers, I have only become more firmly convinced that biblical numbers are based on enumerative combinatorics that deal with calendar calcs.

    ( btw, you don't have any experience with babylonian base 60, do you ? )

    -------------

    Something else I have discovered, is that the oft-heard phrase " the first will be the last ", seems to also bear a relation to these numerical sets....

    Like Richard has outlined, 27 x 37 = 999 = the upper bound of the triple repunit series

    So, in the course of making these tables, in which I am applying the same operation to an entire set, for consistency of course, I find that only certain operations give products which " identify " with other sets ( for lack of a better term ), for example : (2160 / 222 and 2160 / 999 ) are the only two operations that give periodics of 729 and 162, while the sum of 111 is the only repunit with the sum containing the same integers ( 6216) as the product of 144,000 / 666 ( 216.216216..)

    I guess ideally they should be shown with rigorous set notation, but I am still familiarizing myself with it.

    Name:  153.JPG
Views: 66
Size:  49.1 KB

    Name:  999.JPG
Views: 67
Size:  64.8 KB

    So, I have found that these integers/values/integers/place values in pi, extracted roots, all seem to belong to the same sets, in fact I have pages of unique intersections identified so far, all involving these same things.

    I also think that's why numbers like 222, 666, 216, 1080, etc, are central to the theme of the holy of holies, the ark, the word, etc.

    The sum of the Hebrew alphabet ( one of them ) = 4995
    " my words "= 216

    ~ the language is spoken with words, yet " the word " was in the holy of holies

    Two of numbers that Richard has outlined as being central to the " temple " and " the word ", the " ark ", etc, are 216 and 666

    The product of the two integers is exactly 144 shy of 144,000 ( 216 x 666 = 143,856 )

    Granted there are many integers that can be summed to 144, however, the fact that 4995 being one of the sums of the Hebrew alphabet, makes this especially tantalizing, as 4995 can be split to sum to 144, as 49 + 95 = 144

    I took a look at Richard's database for the words summing to 144, and they seem to indeed be central to the textual content of the story, which is also quite intriguing.

    If I had to offer a guess, which is all I can really offer at this point, I'd say those words were assigned that value of 144 for a reason, the main one being that it is an intersection of all these other sets.

    Anyhoo, .....
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by Snakeboy; 04-16-2014 at 10:20 AM. Reason: just...because

  5. #85
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    269
    The totient function of Genesis 1:1 = 2592 and the totient function of John 1:1 = 2160 (notice how the totient function of Genesis 1:1 times 10 = The rounded number of years in a full Zodiac cycle and the totient function of John 1:1 = The rounded number of years in a Zodiac age) ...

    The total sum of all the totient functions for the first 37 integers = 432 ...

    The numerical distance between the totient function of Genesis 1:1 and the totient function of John 1:1 = 432 ...

    The perimeter of the 37th Triangle = 108 (a square with a diameter of 108 has a perimeter of 432 and produces a Golden Spiral with a length of 2592) ...

    Genesis 1:1 GRAMMATICALLY and GEOMETRICALLY breaks down to (666 + 666 + 666) + The 37th Triangle and the sum of all the digital permutations of 432 = (666 + 666 + 666).

    Here's something I recently noticed ...

    The sum of the nearest whole integers of the Genesis 1:1 word values when they are each divided by 37 = 73 (Genesis 1:1 = 37 x 73) ...

    Btw, using rounded values is perfectly valid mathematically. In fact, Mills constant ALWAYS generates a Prime number THROUGH ROUNDED VALUES. Hence, the meaningfulness of rounded values is a real mathematical phenomenon.

    BINI BOBO (The Mystic Meanie)

  6. #86
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    269
    The totient function of Genesis 1:1 = 2592 and the perimeter of the Genesis 1:1 Triangle = 216 ...

    2592 x 10 = The Zodiac Cycle and 216 x 10 = One Zodiac Age ...

    The totient function of John 1:1 = 2160 (216 x 10) ...

    216 x 10 = The diameter of the MOON in miles and the MOON has a diameter of .5184 degrees in our sky (.5184 = .2592 + .2592) ...

    Genesis 1:1 is rooted in the number 37 and is mathematically linked to John 1:1 (hence, the numerical distance between the totient functions of Genesis 1:1 and John 1:1 = The sum of the totient functions for the first 37 integers) ...

    The sum of the totient functions for the first 37 integers = 432 ...

    Genesis 1:1 grammatically AND geometrically breaks down to (666 + 666 + 666) + The 37th Triangle (the sum of 432 with its mirror reflection = 666 AND the sum of all the digital permutations of 432 = 666 + 666 + 666) ...

    2368 = JESUS CHRIST (and is mathematically encoded in Genesis 1:1/John 1:1) ...

    The EXACT midpoint between the totient function of Genesis 1:1 and its MIRROR REFLECTION = The 2368th composite!!! ...

    The SUM of the totient function of John 1:1 with its MIRROR REFLECTION = The 2368th composite!!!

    Here's a few things I noticed about the value of the Hebrew alphabet ...

    The value of the Hebrew alphabet = 4995 = The sum of the triple repdigits (111 through 999) ...

    The numerical distance between 4995 and its mirror image = 999 ...

    499.5 + 499.5 = 999 ...

    There are 27 characters in the Hebrew alphabet (4 + 9 + 9 + 5 = 27 and 9 + 9 + 9 = 27) ...

    The totient function of Genesis 1:1 = The totient function of the Hebrew alphabet (Genesis 1:1 was written in Hebrew) ...

    The value of the Hebrew alphabet (4995) is the 135th multiple of 37 ...

    If we add the 3 HIGHEST permutations of 135 with the 3 LOWEST permutations of 135, we get 666 each time!!! ...

    135 (lowest) + 531 (highest) = 666
    153 (2nd lowest) + 513 (2nd highest) = 666
    315 (3rd lowest) + 351 (3rd highest) = 666

    HENCE, Genesis 1:1 (written in Hebrew) was designed in such a way that it grammatically AND geometrically breaks down to (666 + 666 + 666) + The 37th Triangle. And 666 itself is the numerical distance between the 37th order of EVERY successive polygonal number!!!

    Here's another interesting connection between Genesis 1:1 and 37 ...

    We know that Genesis 1:1 is encoded with mirror reflections. For example ...

    Genesis 1:1 = 37 x 73 = 2701 and 2701 + 1072 = 3773 (which is the ONLY 4-digit number that yields its Prime Factors when it is added to its mirror reflection) ...

    The Prime Order of 37 = 12 and 12^2 = 144

    The Prime Order of 73 = 21 and 21^2 = 441

    Now watch this ...

    The sum of the PRIME FACTORS of the Genesis 1:1 word values (11 + 83 + 7 + 29 + 2 + 43 + 401 + 5 + 79 + 11 + 37 + 2 + 2 + 2 + 37) = The MIRROR REFLECTION of the 37th PRIME!!!

    I am Gambini and I am NOT a "piece" of shit (rather, I am THE shit).
    Last edited by Gambini; 05-24-2014 at 06:44 PM.

  7. #87
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Yakima, Wa
    Posts
    14,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Gambini View Post
    Need more confirmation? Observe ...

    Genesis 1:1 = 37 x 73 = 2701 and 2701 + 1072 (a mirror reflection) = 3773 (a digital combining of the two prime factors of Genesis 1:1). It just so happens that 3773 is the 127th nontrivial palindromic number!!! BAM!!! ...
    Tricky tricky, tricky. Bad little Gambini. You forced the numbers to conform to your pattern by defining single digit palindromes as "trivial." The actual index of 3773 is 137 if you start with zero ... I thought you would have liked that. Of course, if you wanted it to be 136 you could have started counting at one. But to make your pattern fit, you started counting at eleven - ha! This shows how much "wiggle room" you have to force the numbers to fit your patterns. This is a classic example of cognitive bias.

    Here's a list of the all the palindromic numbers less than 5000, starting with zero.

    1: 0
    2: 1
    3: 2
    4: 3
    5: 4
    6: 5
    7: 6
    8: 7
    9: 8
    10: 9
    11: 11
    12: 22
    13: 33
    14: 44
    15: 55
    16: 66
    17: 77
    18: 88
    19: 99
    20: 101
    21: 111
    22: 121
    23: 131
    24: 141
    25: 151
    26: 161
    27: 171
    28: 181
    29: 191
    30: 202
    31: 212
    32: 222
    33: 232
    34: 242
    35: 252
    36: 262
    37: 272
    38: 282
    39: 292
    40: 303
    41: 313
    42: 323
    43: 333
    44: 343
    45: 353
    46: 363
    47: 373
    48: 383
    49: 393
    50: 404
    51: 414
    52: 424
    53: 434
    54: 444
    55: 454
    56: 464
    57: 474
    58: 484
    59: 494
    60: 505
    61: 515
    62: 525
    63: 535
    64: 545
    65: 555
    66: 565
    67: 575
    68: 585
    69: 595
    70: 606
    71: 616
    72: 626
    73: 636
    74: 646
    75: 656
    76: 666
    77: 676
    78: 686
    79: 696
    80: 707
    81: 717
    82: 727
    83: 737
    84: 747
    85: 757
    86: 767
    87: 777
    88: 787
    89: 797
    90: 808
    91: 818
    92: 828
    93: 838
    94: 848
    95: 858
    96: 868
    97: 878
    98: 888
    99: 898
    100: 909
    101: 919
    102: 929
    103: 939
    104: 949
    105: 959
    106: 969
    107: 979
    108: 989
    109: 999
    110: 1001
    111: 1111
    112: 1221
    113: 1331
    114: 1441
    115: 1551
    116: 1661
    117: 1771
    118: 1881
    119: 1991
    120: 2002
    121: 2112
    122: 2222
    123: 2332
    124: 2442
    125: 2552
    126: 2662
    127: 2772
    128: 2882
    129: 2992
    130: 3003
    131: 3113
    132: 3223
    133: 3333
    134: 3443
    135: 3553
    136: 3663
    137: 3773
    138: 3883
    139: 3993
    140: 4004
    141: 4114
    142: 4224
    143: 4334
    144: 4444
    145: 4554
    146: 4664
    147: 4774
    148: 4884
    149: 4994
    • Skepticism is the antiseptic of the mind.
    • Remember why we debate. We have nothing to lose but the errors we hold. Who but a stubborn fool would hold to errors once they have been exposed?

    Check out my blog site

  8. #88
    Unregistered Guest

    Help

    My name is Shannon and I'm tripping out but here is a list of me and my boyfriends DOB and life path numbers...I believe we are twin flames and lets just say I'm going thru some crazy coincidences..please help
    Shannon 7/4/79 lifepath 1 (self)
    scarlet 2/2/59 lifepath 1 Mother
    Gordon 10/9/1960 lifepath 8 father
    Gordon 7/7/86 lifepath 11 brother
    derrick 10/6/89 lifepath 7 brother
    taylor 7/7/98 lifepath 5 daughter
    Dayton 5/25/00 lifepath 5 daughter
    Tristan 1/10/2007 lifepath 11 son
    hayden 4/19/2008 lifepath 6 son
    miley 3/19/2014 lifepath 11 daughter


    cory 8/21/77 lifepath 8 boyfriend
    Debbie 4/1/1958 lifepath 1 motherinlaw
    cliff 12/21/57 lifepath 1 fatherinlaw
    cindy 7/2/1979 lifepath 8 sisterinlaw
    michelle 3/21/1983 lifepath 9 sisterinlaw
    cliff jr 4/5/1988 lifepath 8 brotherinlaw
    colton 1/1/2003 lifepath 7 stepson

    I need help because something is happening in my life and I need answers because I feel something is going on and the date 5/12/2017 is standing out and if you need to contact me at Shannon.corygillis@gmail.com

  9. #89
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    138
    I did not know that it was normal to consider 0 as the first Palindrome. I have read about Palindromes before but i don't know how i missed that 0 is the first. Its a really long time since i checked it so maybe that was why.

    Incredible because; number 3773 is the 137th Palindrome.
    Forget number 127 in this, its order of 137 is alot more interesting.

    No wonder we find A alpha in Genesis 1:1, John 1:1 & Revelation 1:1.
    It just sealed the deal there.

    Total value of Revelation 1:1 = 5X3773
    Total value of Genesis 1:1 added With its Mirror is: 2701 + 1702 = 3773
    Last edited by Desmild; 04-20-2017 at 03:57 PM.

  10. #90
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Yakima, Wa
    Posts
    14,611
    Quote Originally Posted by Desmild View Post
    I did not know that it was normal to consider 0 as the first Palindrome. I have read about Palindromes before but i don't know how i missed that 0 is the first. Its a really long time since i checked it so maybe that was why.

    Incredible because; number 3773 is the 137th Palindrome.
    Forget number 127 in this, its order of 137 is alot more interesting.

    No wonder we find A alpha in Genesis 1:1, John 1:1 & Revelation 1:1.
    It just sealed the deal there.

    Total value of Revelation 1:1 = 5X3773
    Total value of Genesis 1:1 added With its Mirror is: 2701 + 1702 = 3773
    Incredible? Why would you say that? It's nothing but an obvious mathematical necessity. No one had any "choice" in the matter, not even a god, because the numbers follow by logical mathematical necessity. It's the same for all of them. They follow the pattern: 1xy: xyyx

    1xy: xyyx
    121: 2112
    122: 2222
    123: 2332
    124: 2442
    125: 2552
    126: 2662
    127: 2772
    128: 2882
    129: 2992
    130: 3003
    131: 3113
    132: 3223
    133: 3333
    134: 3443
    135: 3553
    136: 3663
    137: 3773
    138: 3883
    139: 3993

    Every number in that sequence follows the same pattern. There is nothing remarkable about the pattern 1xy: xyyx just because you happen to put x = 3 and y = 7 into the equation.

    Numerology is a foolish game played by mathematically ignorant people.
    • Skepticism is the antiseptic of the mind.
    • Remember why we debate. We have nothing to lose but the errors we hold. Who but a stubborn fool would hold to errors once they have been exposed?

    Check out my blog site

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •