Google Ads

Google Ads

Bible Wheel Book

Google Ads

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 30
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,965
    Quote Originally Posted by duxrow View Post

    Roger that, Gil. My favorites are hibernation and migration, relating to the loading of Noah's Ark.
    Right! This way you won't have a clue to what goes on outside.

  2. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,965

    The bible has a built-in dictionary

    The bible has a built-in dictionary.
    Something hard to be understood is usually written in 2 or 3 different ways for clarification.
    (KJV) Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

    (KJV) Genesis 1:27
    1 - So God created man in his [own] image,
    2 - in the image of God created he him;
    3 - male and female created he them.

    Actually if you read the verse preceding you'll discover that when God spoke in plural form he actually meant it for himself alone:

    (KJV) Genesis 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
    (KJV) Genesis 1:27 So God created man in his [own] image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them.

  3. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,013

    And you have to keep reading. As we learned from Ellery Queen, it's only in the final chapter where we learn the Butler done it -- how Noah knew the diff between the clean and unclean animals isn't disclosed till Leviticus, and then Peter's vision of the Great Sheet modified that. amen?
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  4. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,965
    Quote Originally Posted by duxrow View Post
    :tea:
    And you have to keep reading. As we learned from Ellery Queen, it's only in the final chapter where we learn the Butler done it -- how Noah knew the diff between the clean and unclean animals isn't disclosed till Leviticus, and then Peter's vision of the Great Sheet modified that. amen? :thumb:
    All animals were considered clean in Noah's time. But Noah and his predecessors were vegetarians as God commanded in Genesis 1 and 2.

    Then again there was Abel and his offering. But maybe he offered but didn't eat.

    It was only after Noah that they ate meat. Was there any evidence that they ate meat in Genesis? Isaac ate venison. Esau was a hunter.

    But only after Leviticus were certain animals considered unclean.

    But i think Peter's indicated that the blood of Jesus cleansed even the animals if I'm not mistaken.

  5. #15
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,013

    The Butler's dream meant LIFE, but the Baker's dream meant DEATH. Has to do with how you slice it, I spose, but you'd better have the True Bread in your top basket... hmm?
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  6. #16
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Yakima, Wa
    Posts
    12,691
    Quote Originally Posted by gilgal View Post
    All animals were considered clean in Noah's time. But Noah and his predecessors were vegetarians as God commanded in Genesis 1 and 2.

    Then again there was Abel and his offering. But maybe he offered but didn't eat.

    It was only after Noah that they ate meat. Was there any evidence that they ate meat in Genesis? Isaac ate venison. Esau was a hunter.

    But only after Leviticus were certain animals considered unclean.

    But i think Peter's indicated that the blood of Jesus cleansed even the animals if I'm not mistaken.
    If all the animals were clean in Noah's time, how do you understand this passage?

    Genesis 7:1 And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation. 2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
    • Skepticism is the antiseptic of the mind.
    • Remember why we debate. We have nothing to lose but the errors we hold. Who but a stubborn fool would hold to errors once they have been exposed?

    Check out my blog site

  7. #17
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Daytona
    Posts
    1,013

    Without the vision of the Sheet, Peter wouldn't have known to go to Cornelius house and accept the Gentiles as equal with Jews. Then Peter became Minister to the Jews, and Paul to the Gentiles. Gal 2:7 The dietary biz just a distraction, I think... :hungry?:
    Dux allows: "It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out the matter". Pr25:2

  8. #18
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,965
    Quote Originally Posted by Richard Amiel McGough View Post
    If all the animals were clean in Noah's time, how do you understand this passage?

    Genesis 7:1 And the LORD said unto Noah, Come thou and all thy house into the ark; for thee have I seen righteous before me in this generation. 2 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.
    You got a point there.

  9. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    1,965
    Quote Originally Posted by duxrow View Post

    Without the vision of the Sheet, Peter wouldn't have known to go to Cornelius house and accept the Gentiles as equal with Jews. Then Peter became Minister to the Jews, and Paul to the Gentiles. Gal 2:7 The dietary biz just a distraction, I think... :hungry?:
    Just like what God told Peter. The Gentiles are justified through faith.

  10. #20

    Science and Da Bible

    Quote Originally Posted by gilgal View Post
    ... the bible isn't a book of science but the stories can be proven to be scientifically accurate. And it goes beyond because our science can't explain everything either.


    (Not sure if the attachement will work - first time I have tried attaching a pdf to a post??) If it is readable, the pdf is on the Periodic Table -- an indication that there is WAY MORE science in the Bible than most Christians realise -- which tends to upset the fundies, who don't like the notion that science and the Bible have common ground.
    Attached Images Attached Images

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may edit your posts
  •