
Originally Posted by
CWH
See that? Christian women are supposed to be in subjection to their husbands, obeying them, and calling them "lord." This sexism is fundamental to Christianity. Indeed, it is as fundamental as the very relationship between God, Christ, and man:
1 Corinthians 11:3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman is the man; and the head of Christ is God.
Men are over women in the same way as Christ is over men!
So is the government over its citizens and the law over above any one in the country, boss over his employees. In human society there is always hierarchy of rank in order for it to function effectively; it's a matte of fact.
So you are fine with the idea that men should rule over women, and women must be in subjection to men, obey them, and call them lord? I pity your wife.
And as for governments - it is not the same at all. Men and women are equal under the law in the USA, and that's how it should be in all governments. You are showing (again) how religion retards moral and social progress!

Originally Posted by
CWH
Captured people whether women or men are always put into subjection by their victors.
Yes, and so the women were like slaves not "wives" as you like to imagine.

Originally Posted by
CWH
If that's how God does things, why did he fail to mention it anywhere in the Bible? And if it's not in the Bible, why do you feel free to make it up and suggest it is what God will do?
It's the nature of God to hide things and for men to find out, which is why Jesu talks allegorically and used parables.
Finding something that is there is not the same as inventing something from your imagination.

Originally Posted by
CWH
You don't know how many of the 32,000 virgins committed suicide or were killed trying to escape. But one thing is clear - they were women captured in war and put in subjugation to the soldiers that murdered everyone they ever loved. Religion has corrupted your sense of morals if you cannot see how wrong this is.
How about those who justified the killing of Osama, Saddam, Pol Pot, Hitler are their senses also been corrupted?
You are hiding from what I said by changing the subject.

Originally Posted by
CWH
There is no end to the irony of Christians justifying genocide even as they claim that we would have no morals if not for the God of the Bible.
I justify the killing of evil men but not good men. I believe you agree with me.
I was not talking about killing evil men. Again, you are hiding from what I said by changed the subject.

Originally Posted by
CWH
The word "humbled" in this context means "screwed" as in "having had sexual intercourse with." It's easy to prove. I'll leave that as an exercise for the student since I have little time this morning.
Check any English dictionary, "humbled" has never mean "screwed". So one have humbled his wife and the wife have humbled her husband after sex sex....Brilliant! "Hey, Darling, can you humble me tonight?".
You really need to learn the basic principles of Bible study. The Bible was not written in English. The Hebrew word translated as "humbled" is עִנָּה (Strong's 6031). Duane L. Christensen explained it's meaning in his entry on Deuteronomy 21:14 in the Word Biblical Commentary:The piel verbal form עִנָּה, which is translated here as 'you have humbled her,' carries the sense of 'doing violence to' in sexual matters (cf. 22:24, 29).
The verses he cited make the truth of his claim perfectly obvious (note that they come from the same general context in Deuteronomy):Deuteronomy 22:23 If a damsel that is a virgin be betrothed unto an husband, and a man find her in the city, and lie with her [have sex with her]; 24 Then ye shall bring them both out unto the gate of that city, and ye shall stone them with stones that they die; the damsel, because she cried not, being in the city; and the man, because he hath humbled his neighbour's wife: so thou shalt put away evil from among you.
Deuteronomy 22:28 If a man find a damsel that is a virgin, which is not betrothed, and lay hold on her, and lie with her [have sex with her], and they be found; 29 Then the man that lay with her shall give unto the damsel's father fifty shekels of silver, and she shall be his wife; because he hath humbled her, he may not put her away all his days.
My interpretation stands. The word "humbled" means "screwed" or "had sexual intercourse with" in these contexts. It is totally obvious to anyone who can read even the English translation and it is supported by the scholars.
Your mimicry of my use of "brilliant" is making you look really stupid since you don't know what you are talking about.

Originally Posted by
CWH
Yes, it sounds like a totally evil and wicked God because he constantly chooses VIOLENCE as if it were the best solution. He commands genocide and rape of the captive virgins. This makes him indistinguishable from a brutal Bronze age tribal war god. Why would God choose to act like that? Is he not free to show us a better way?
I have asked, what would you do if you were God? Save everybody and polluted the world with people and pollution, Stop the wombs of evil women but allow the sperms of their evil men to spread....Brilliant!
Again, your use of "brilliant" is idiotic. And you didn't answer my question. Why would God choose to act like a brutal Bronze age tribal war god? There are ten thousand things an Almighty God could have done rather than commanding more violence or letting the "sperms of their evil men to spread." For example, he could have just closed the wombs of the women that would have been impregnated by that sperm. Or he could have given some intelligent laws instead of the stupid, cruel, and immoral ones that we see in the Bible. But you can't see that because you are committed to the truth of things that are false. Good luck with that, Cheow.
Bookmarks