I'm wondering, being that the Kingdom of Heaven is within us, if the sound originates there. I know that sounds terribly simplistic![]()
agreed...the ineffable name.
Mary got pregnant by god whispering into her ear.
Actually study myths and religion and folk stories and the ORAL traditions...is sound important?
Am I a liar or a lyre?
no such thing as a vacuum
nature abhors a vacuum
the link you offered, quotes Maxwell saying he believed there was an aether...SOUND needs a medium
that is THE BIGGEST FIB in science today, that Space is a vacuum.
Explain plasma?
Explain infrasound
Explain sound waves that are 57 octaves below middle 'c' coming out of black holes?
GRAVITY WAVE is SOUND
that is why they couldn't find it.
They said space had no medium for sound travel.
But it does...it is just that the peaks and valleys of the sound wave are 10 billion years apart.
Sound would not be a particle though, would it?
I suspect the infrasounds (real low) and ultrasounds (real high) are what turn particles into waves.
These SOUNDs are the reference points.
thanks
I found some good info
namaste
Last edited by Raphael; 11-22-2009 at 08:37 PM.
I'm wondering, being that the Kingdom of Heaven is within us, if the sound originates there. I know that sounds terribly simplistic![]()
You have been discussing wether the most basic particle of matter is sound? In Gen.1;1 It says " In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth." In John 1;1 it says " In the beginning was the word...." So therefore the word which is "sound" was with God when he first created earth(matter). This sort of goes along with the idea of sound being the basic building block of matter. Then it says in Gen;1;3 that " God said, let there be light." So again creation is caused by speaking. This is sound creating matter?
dan b
Hi Dan,
I don't think that sound can create matter because sound is transmitted by matter. In the beginning, before there was matter, there was no sound.
To me, the essence of a WORD is the IDEA that it stands for. Words are sometimes communicated by sound and other times by symbols like these alphabetic characters that I am writing right now. And sometimes they are only in my head with no sound or character but just an idea.
Great chatting,
Richard
- Skepticism is the antiseptic of the mind.
- Remember why we debate. We have nothing to lose but the errors we hold. Who but a stubborn fool would hold to errors once they have been exposed?
Check out my blog site
what if sound creates matter and matter creates sound?
which came first?
Chicken or the Egg?
Man or Woman?
Electricity or Magnetism?
LIGHT or SOUND?
Sound or Matter?
My theory.
SOUND and LIGHT solves wave/particle paradox.
SOUND can be converted to LIGHT and LIGHT can be converted back to SOUND.
Hence here is your SIMPLE formula to solve this paradox between wave (sound) particle (light) duality.
How did Mozart compose his music at such an early age?
Did Mozart have 'images' in his head which he translated into sheet music?
Listen to this composition 'drawn' by a 6 year old child.
start at 13:00http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mf5otGNbkuc
Ja, I think so.
namaste
Hummm ... I have a couple problems with that. I don't think anyone has ever created matter with sound, but making sound with matter is a most common thing. So there seems to be an asymmetry here.
Also, I don't know what the word "sound" would mean except wave patterns in matter. So if sound is defined as a dynamic property of matter, then sound could not exist without matter, so if there were no matter there would be no sound to create the matter. But that leads directly into your next question ....
Electricity and magnetism are aspects of a single unified phenomenon called the "electromagnetic field" so neither is first.
As far as I know, light and sound are not different aspects of a single phenomenon. For example, light can travel in a vacuum, sound can not.
Thanks for the link. It was a very interesting watch. I've seen the context/color thing before. It is very striking - most folks are stunned to find that colors that look totally different in different contexts are actually the same.
But I don't know what you meant about a formula to convert light to sound. Sure, it's quite simple to make a machine that translates the info in the light into sound or vice-versa but I can't see why that would be significant in any fundamental way (though it can be quite beautiful).
Good to be chatting,
Richard
- Skepticism is the antiseptic of the mind.
- Remember why we debate. We have nothing to lose but the errors we hold. Who but a stubborn fool would hold to errors once they have been exposed?
Check out my blog site
This is the best piece of evidence most often overlooked.
The Sator Square in Tesla's handwriting.
The quest for the grail is not quite done.
Now whose handwriting is this in?
The author some time ago claimed IF they found Higgs, it would be associated with SOUND.
http://at37.wordpress.com/2012/02/25...enrose-witten/
re: Sator Square algorithm
He also claimed the TENET cross comprised of 9 letters would be connected to SOUND and GRAVITY.
namaste
RaphaEL
Last edited by Raphael; 04-04-2012 at 06:54 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks