The "Bible Wheel Book" as being read by Chas.

[Charles Wade]

Ram, from what I get from this exchange is that you know the trinity doctrine to be false. BD writings has many procs. explaining why the Trinity doctrine is a false doctrine.

So what you are you saying? Please clarify.
You think there needs to be an essay about the history of when it is was accepted as a false doctrine ?
Or are you a trinity believer and that is why you can not except her revelations being divine, or is it because of the history of the false doctrine was not mentioned?
I am having a hard time grasping your reasoning of this history of this. Yes that history you referred or linked me to is the same false doctrine I was taught and all Christianity believes.I thought you had some new evidence.
What bearing does an essay of how this doctrine began or who, I find irrelevant.

What I find relevant is whether the doctrine is true or false.....
? thx...chas.

[Richard Amiel McGough]

Ram, from what I get from this exchange is that you know the trinity doctrine to be false. BD writings has many procs. explaining why the Trinity doctrine is a false doctrine.

So what you are you saying? Please clarify.
You think there needs to be an essay about the history of why it is a false doctrine ?
Or are you a trinity believer and that is why you can not except her revelations being divine? thx...chas.

What did I write that made you think I reject the doctrine of the Trinity?

The question has nothing to do with the validity of that doctrine, but whether or not Bertha's writings contain any indications that they were dictated by God.

All the best.

[Charles Wade]

What did I write that made you think I reject the doctrine of the Trinity?

The question has nothing to do with the validity of that doctrine, but whether or not Bertha's writings contain any indications that they were dictated by God.

All the best.

I have no idea, what gave me that idea. Think I will get off this merry go round
Thanks for the spin.....chas

[Richard Amiel McGough]

What did I write that made you think I reject the doctrine of the Trinity?

The question has nothing to do with the validity of that doctrine, but whether or not Bertha's writings contain any indications that they were dictated by God.

All the best.

I have no idea, what gave me that idea. Think I will get off this merry go round
Thanks for the spin.....chas

If you have no idea where you got the idea, then I would guess we have been riding your merry-go-round, not mine. I don't blame you for wanting off. Bertha's writings are demonstrable human in origin.

[Charles Wade]

If you have no idea where you got the idea, then I would guess we have been riding your merry-go-round, not mine. I don't blame you for wanting off. Bertha's writings are demonstrable human in origin.

I thank you for your discernment.
In His love, Chas.

[Richard Amiel McGough]

I thank you for your discernment.
In His love, Chas.

Glad to be of service.

But I'm sorry you wanted to quit the conversation without addressing the issues I raised concerning the authentic history of the development of the doctrine of the Trinity.

[Charles Wade]

Glad to be of service.

But I'm sorry you wanted to quit the conversation without addressing the issues I raised concerning the authentic history of the development of the doctrine of the Trinity.

I thank you for the opportunity to discuss the "ISSUES" of the authentic history of the Christian Trinity Doctrine, but no thanks, I will pass on this one.
Chas.