1) That's right. And that's why I corrected myself in my last post. Did you read it?
Originally Posted by Ed J
2) That identity shows how you pervert the actual meaning of the words of Scripture. The fact that "he was numbered with transgressors" has nothing to do with the identity Jesus = 74 = Lucifer! That's just plain nuts! With logic like that, you could prove that white is black and up is down. You are just playing vain game of meaninglessness and you make a mockery of the Bible.
A) Yes. Just like the guys who put "Lucifer" in it were "free" to insert a false tradition.
B) I never said it was in the AKJV Bible. I said it was in the Latin Vulgate, and that is true. 3) Seems to me definitely.
A) My statement is true. You know that the identities don't actually "prove" anything because when they "prove" something you don't like, you explain them away. Therefore, using your logic, Muslims can choose which identities they like and "explain away" anything that "proves" Christianity. I've explained this a million times and you still don't understand. It is elementary logic but you just don't get it.Come on Ed. It's obvious you want to be believed. The only way that will ever happen is for you to deal with the facts of reality. Don't you get it?
B) Ignoring the facts and throwing the words back is the way little children act. You should be ashamed. You have every opportunity to deal with the facts but you refuse. I've explained it a million times but you are not dealing with the facts that I have presented. It would be great if you actually answered my point about how you know that the numbers don't prove anything.
All the best,