The Primordial Language - Confirmation of the Divine Creator

[Anita Meyer]

Richard, you might like to read about this in her work at page 12 here

Hereby I also have a question about something else: I wonder if there is as study regarding adamah and eretz in qabalah with comments?
If not it should not be a problem to make one myself, I have a concordance where the words occur.

Hi NumberX, yes Richard could read 'the look inside the book link', but the pictures that he’s waiting for arent posted yet, but he could read somewhat about 'the Theory of Evolution' and why I don’t believe in it. However this is not the whole chapter, what I write is quite lengthy in the book.

Now in regards to Adam Kadmon (the Primordial Man) and Qabalah, I’d like to link this up with the qabalistic 'Tree of Life diagram since Adam (the first man in the image of G-d) is none other than a colossal microcosmic human being who is conceived as a model for the human world. This is inferred from the verse in Genesis "Let us make man in our own image".

Man, having been created in G-d’s image, is said by the qabalists to be comprised of the very same cosmic elements of the sefirot. But one may ask what actually are the 'sefirot'? Few fail to tell you (or properly explain) what this is truly all about… they may beat around the bush in mythical talk as if you are supposed to understand - as if this is some highly guarded secret. But I will break it down for you and others who read.

What the 'Tree of Life' diagram actually is, is a wonderful diagram for the stages of emanation. Few people know this (its also explained in depth in my book) but the 'Tree of Life' is a replica of the 5 platonic solids. These are: 1-Tetrahedron, 2-Cube, 3-Octahedron, 4-Icosahedron, 5-Dodecahedron. Actually you can count the "Sphere" as being number 1.

The ones that comprise the 'Tree of Live' are 3 shapes… they are the 1-Tetrahedron, 2-Cube and 5-Decahedron. And when we overlay these 3 shapes to the 'Tree Of Life' we can visibly see the full body of the 'Tree Of Life' diagram take form.



Sephiroth numbers 10, 9, 8, 7, creates the Tetrahedron… numbers 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, creates the Hexahedron/Cube and Octahedron… and numbers 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, creates the Icosahedron and the Dodecahedron. You can also see how the numbers I’ve underlined overlap themselves from 8,7 (the Tetrahedron) to 8,7 (Hexahedron/Cube and Octahedron) to 6,5,4 (Icosahedron and Dodecahedron). So as we can clearly see the diagram of the 'Tree Of Life' shows a geometrically intelligent 'unite of growth increase' of one that condenses while permeating by a unit of growth (by its distribution of one through the other) which is very similar to the Fibonacci growth sequence found in nature.

Truly what this is imploring is the order in which things in nature form and grow. The Tetrahedron is the first structured form from which all life grows by. Actually it is the sphere first, but the sphere is programed to turn into a Tetrahedron. This follows as all things in life are 3-dimensional.

For instance… following this thought, we can clearly see this recursive (self-repeating) pattern in the fertilization of a human egg. It starts off as a single sphere. It then splits in half (2) and then splits again into (4) and so on… Six is a multiple of three. The basic building block of solid form is the tetrahedron, a pyramid with a triangular base and all sides the same length. The pollen grain below appears to have the same base form as the human embryo at four cells. The fourth cell of the human embryo is at the back, in the middle. Imagine joining the centers of the cells in three dimensions. Now you have a triangular pyramid called a tetrahedron.



The human embryo develops according to the mathematics known as the Binary Sequence, created by doubling the previous number. Cells split into two. When the tetrahedron form of four cells doubles to eight cells, the embryo takes up the mathematical geometry of the star tetrahedron, two intersecting tetrahedrons, as below. You cannot see the eighth cell, which again, is at the middle at the back.



This same process also follows through with the formation of atoms (which have a 3-part nature) that form into material substances.

[Anita Meyer]

Hi Anita,

I have been enjoying reading all the posts on this Thread....thank you for sharing your work.

I have one question. If as you say: "All the letters of the Hebrew Alphabet are contained in the letter Bet", why is it that the modern form of its shape is different from its ancient form? I would think that the original forms of the Hebrew letters would be where design would be found if it were there. We know that the meanings of the letters did not change, but their shapes did...

God Bless,

Rose

Your welcome Rose! For starters let me just say this: There is no linguist in the world that can confidently tell anyone where language or written writing originally came from. They cannot truly tell you that so and so writing came before so and so writing. All they can do is surmise. Now, I will tell you from lengthy study that ALL written writing compiled from every known alphabet (even Chinese) can all be linked to the Hebrew block style of writing that first appeared when Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the 10 commandments. We can see similarity in these letters even to cuneiform which is said to be the oldest.

So what I estimate happened was that Adam and Eve originally spoke this language, and the 7th generation from them which was Enoch (who was recorded in his book as well as the book of Jubilees and additionally the Dead Sea Scrolls) who was the FIRST SCRIBE of written writing which was shown to him by G-d’s appointed angel 'Uriel'. Enoch calls these 'ketav einayim' (eye writings).

Now through the centuries these letters became mottled and distorted (but we can still see the similarities). Then the letters were revised again (in their proper forms) when Moses came down from Mount Sinai.

In my book I have a whole chapter called 'language similarities' in which I reveal how all the alphabetical letters that are found in every single alphabet ever found in the world are still nonetheless the same Hebrew letters.

Hebrew was the ORIGINAL PRIMORDIAL LANGUAGE! - always has, and always will be.

[Anita Meyer]

I studied the Qabbalah a lot too while searching for truth. I have been rather quiet about it because so much misinformation is out there and I didn't want to cause folks to stumble. The great irony is that God used my studies to lead me to faith in Christ. I'll be writing about this more now that the seed of God has blossomed in my heart and I have been transformed so I no longer fear ignorant sectarian religionists.

Good for you Richard! I consider myself a “complete” Jew simply because I clearly understand what the Pharisees could not, which was G-d’s redemptive plan for mankind which includes Jesus (a suffering righteous servant). I clearly understand G-d’s 3-part nature, which BTW can be found right in the very first 3 letters of Genesis 1:1 of the first word Barashith. What’s more, biblical prophesies have unfolded to this effect (such as Daniel 9). Additionally what had happened to Adam and Eve in the garden was in effect the whole reason for the gospel in a nutshell.

Actually, the idea of evolution itself is not a problem. It denotes nothing but changes in form that come from changes in DNA sequences. And we know that those patterns can change by natural selection just as they do when we humans change them by selective breeding. Of course, there are some HUGE problems around the origin of life, and the formation of complex organs, but I'm pretty sure that species originated through evolution. At least most of the evidence points in that direction.

How does your work contradict evolution? That would be an interesting discussion. Perhaps we should start a new thread for that.

What I’ve found is that what science calls “natural selection” is NOT actual evolution happening. When geneticists try and manipulate existing genetic material they can only reorganize or reshuffle it, but they can never attain new information. Typically, there is a loss of information in the DNA.

[Rose]

Your welcome Rose! For starters let me just say this: There is no linguist in the world that can confidently tell anyone where language or written writing originally came from. They cannot truly tell you that so and so writing came before so and so writing. All they can do is surmise. Now, I will tell you from lengthy study that ALL written writing compiled from every known alphabet (even Chinese) can all be linked to the Hebrew block style of writing that first appeared when Moses came down from Mount Sinai with the 10 commandments. We can see similarity in these letters even to cuneiform which is said to be the oldest.

So what I estimate happened was that Adam and Eve originally spoke this language, and the 7th generation from them which was Enoch (who was recorded in his book as well as the book of Jubilees and additionally the Dead Sea Scrolls) who was the FIRST SCRIBE of written writing which was shown to him by G-d’s appointed angel 'Uriel'. Enoch calls these 'ketav einayim' (eye writings).

Now through the centuries these letters became mottled and distorted (but we can still see the similarities). Then the letters were revised again (in their proper forms) when Moses came down from Mount Sinai.

In my book I have a whole chapter called 'language similarities' in which I reveal how all the alphabetical letters that are found in every single alphabet ever found in the world are still nonetheless the same Hebrew letters.

Hebrew was the ORIGINAL PRIMORDIAL LANGUAGE! - always has, and always will be.

Hi Anita,

Thank you for your response, but I don't think you quite got my question. I wasn't speaking of other languages, but rather the ancient form of Hebrew itself. The ancient form of the Hebrew letters is shown in the chart below, and as you can see Bet looks quite different from its latter block form, though of course the meaning remains the same. With that in mind, why wouldn't the ancient shape be the Original Primordial Form of the Hebrew language?





Rose

[Richard Amiel McGough]

Good for you Richard! I consider myself a 'complete' Jew simply because I clearly understand what the Pharisees could not, which was G-d’s redemptive plan for mankind which includes Jesus (a suffering righteous servant). I clearly understand G-d’s 3-part nature, which BTW can be found right in the very first 3 letters of Genesis 1:1 of the first word Barashith. What’s more, biblical prophesies have unfolded to this effect (such as Daniel 9). Additionally what had happened to Adam and Eve in the garden was in effect the whole reason for the gospel in a nutshell.

Yes, freedom is a wonderful thing!

And I agree about BRA (the first three letters of the Bible. They are

Bet - A symbol of the Son (Ben)
Resh - A symbol of the Spirit (Ruach)
Aleph - A symbol of the Father (Av)

And it goes much deeper than this, of course!

But as for any connection with the prophecy of Dan 9, I would tend to disagree. But that's another (very long) discussion for another time.

What I’ve found is that what science calls 'natural selection' is NOT actual evolution happening. When geneticists try and manipulate existing genetic material they can only reorganize or reshuffle it, but they can never attain new information. Typically, there is a loss of information in the DNA.

I agree that "new information" is one of the most difficult challenges that natural selection must overcome. But I am not yet convinced by the arguments that natural selection is incapable of such. This too would be another (very long) discussion. I should probably open a new Science subforum so we can discuss it.

All the very best,

Richard

[NumberX]

Thank you Anita for your extensive reply. The earth gives growth and development, can not give anything else. We connect with God again. As development the 3 and 4 are connected as base in the first creation story in The Bible too, the 3 days with 4 times God speaks. Just look at the second picture here and there you can read about it too. This writer has written several books (in Dutch and which I have bought and which are in our libraries) and has also intellectually and freely explained the sefiroth in his book "Het Mensbeeld in de Kabbala". But I am a bit dumb to understand most of it.

[Anita Meyer]

Hi Rose, you ask, why wouldn't the ancient shape be the original primordial form of the Hebrew language?

This is perhaps because as the writing was used over the centuries it became mottled and irregular, of course I’m sure their were different stylist that preferred to write it in their own special way, but close enough to be recognized as still being a (B) Bet . Kind of like today where people have different styles of writing their letters. But that all changed when Moses brought down the 10 commandments from Mount Sinai. This is the first time in history that we see this “block style” form of the Hebrew letters. Perhaps this is why the Torah writers (from that time on) had such strict rules to writing, and why so much effort and emphasis was put into writing with the proper etiquette.

Here is a better letter chart that shows the progression and slight changes that occurred throughout the centuries with the Hebrew letter Bet. As you can see even though its ancient form looks different than the modern form we can see that even though there were some positional shifts in writing it, it is still a letter Bet.

[Anita Meyer]

Rose, what is also interesting to note (from the chart above) is that the Hebrew letter "Tov" at one time looked like a Christian cross. In fact many Jews don’t know this, but in Israel there are ancient Jewish tombs that have a ancient Hebrew Tov cross on them. This can also be found in Ezekiel: Ezekiel 9:4 - And said to him, Go throughout the city of Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things that are done in it. Additionally the Hebrew word for "Mark" that is used in Ezekiel 9:4 is 'Tav'.

Some may also wonder what the mark was that was put on Cain’s forehead by G-d. It just so happens that the Hebrew word for 'Mark' mentioned in Genesis 4:15 is called an 'owth'. It ends in a Tov, which was most likely the Hebrew letter Tov, which means sealed/complete/finished. symbolizing that nobody was to touch or kill Cain.

[Rose]

Rose, what is also interesting to note (from the chart above) is that the Hebrew letter "Tov" at one time looked like a Christian cross. In fact many Jews don’t know this, but in Israel there are ancient Jewish tombs that have a ancient Hebrew Tov cross on them. This can also be found in Ezekiel: Ezekiel 9:4 - And said to him, Go throughout the city of Jerusalem and put a mark on the foreheads of those who grieve and lament over all the detestable things that are done in it. Additionally the Hebrew word for "Mark" that is used in Ezekiel 9:4 is 'Tav'.

Some may also wonder what the mark was that was put on Cain’s forehead by G-d. It just so happens that the Hebrew word for 'Mark' mentioned in Genesis 4:15 is called an 'owth'. It ends in a Tov, which was most likely the Hebrew letter Tov, which means sealed/complete/finished. symbolizing that nobody was to touch or kill Cain.

Hi Anita,

Richard has some very good articles on TAV, here's a link to one of them. Spoke 22, TAV.


Rose

[NumberX]

I like to announce that I feel it is time to leave this site now. There is a time for everything under heavens http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EKHstR6ndus
All the best!