Hey there Ed,
Your post proves that English Gematria is utterly meaningless because you can manipulate the words to get the whatever results you want while ignoring the millions of numerical identities that contradict your position. This is obvious when we review your list.
For example, you used the identity "Allah is devil" = 114. But your grammar is wrong. The correct grammar would be Allah is the devil" = 147. And we all know that you would have used this identity if you were trying to build a pattern on the number 147. We see exactly the same erroneous "force-fitting" when you wrote "Islam false" rather than "Islam is false." This shows that it's all just made up.
And you identity "Lucifer liar" is doubly erroneous. First, because the grammar is wrong. You should have written "Lucifer is a liar" or something like that. Second, and more importantly, the word "Lucifer" is not the name of the devil! It is a word that means "light bearer" and it was erroneously inserted into the King James Bible because the translators copied the Latin Bible version of Isaiah 14:12 (How thou art fallen, O Lucifer). Exactly the same word "lucifer" is used in the same Latin Bible in reference to Jesus in 2 Peter:
2 Peter 1:19 We have also a more sure word of prophecy; whereunto ye do well that ye take heed, as unto a light that shineth in a dark place, until the day dawn, and the day star [Latin: Lucifer] arise in your hearts:
See that? The Latin Bible, which is the Bible that the KJV translators used to get the name "Lucifer" in Isaiah 14:12, tells believers to wait until "lucifer arises in your hearts." There is nothing in either the original Hebrew or Greek scriptures that indicates "Lucifer" is a name of the devil. The KJV is fundamentally flawed on this point.
And your idea that Allah was the "moongod" is false. Arabic Christians have used the name "Allah" for the one true God of Christianity for many centuries. They do not think "Allah" denotes a "moongod." And neither is there a single Muslim on the planet that believes Allah is the "moongod." All your conclusions are wrong. The numbers prove nothing. You can make them say anything you want, and you ignore them when they suggest things you don't like. For example, you love the number 74 because it is the value of Jesus, Messiah, and Gospel. Well, great! It's also the value of
MUHAMMAD = 74, and as you know, Muhammad taught in the Quran that Jesus was the Messiah who preached the Gospel given by Allah. So if your numbers prove anything, they prove that Muhammad = 74 is from the same God who designed these identities based on the number 74. Of course, anyone can see this is false. The numbers prove nothing.
I've explained the problems with English Gematria many times in this forum, but you have ignored the evidence. Why is that? The problem is that there are too many words that overlap so you can select (cherry pick) any group that you like to "prove" your point while IGNORING all the other words that are meaningless.
There is one thing I would like to know. Given that I have proven over and over again that there is no legitimacy to English Gematria, and you have never refuted the evidence I have presented, why do you continue to believe in it?
All the best,
Richard
Bookmarks