
Originally Posted by
Cheow Wee Hock
Thanks for the link. Here is the "logic" that he used to arrive at his conclusion:

Originally Posted by
Ken Raggio
The Four Beasts of Daniel 7 - What they CANNOT represent.
The vast majority of all Bible commentaries and teaching material will tell you that the four beasts in Daniel's dream are the same four empires that are mentioned in Nebuchadnezzars statue: namely, Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome. Most of these commentaries were written decades ago, if not centuries ago, long before modern events began to fulfill these prophecies. It would have been IMPOSSIBLE to identify these nations as we now can, as recently as one century ago!
What Daniel's Four Beasts CANNOT be...
Most so-called prophecy teachers will tell you that Daniel's beasts represent the same nations depicted in the great STATUE OF NEBUCHADNEZZAR.
They say that the
1. LION is ancient BABYLON
2. BEAR is ancient MEDO-PERSIA
3. LEOPARD is ancient GREECE
4. DREADFUL BEAST is ancient ROME
This interpretation cannot possibly be accurate, and here is why:
In Nebuchadnezzar's dream, each level of the great statue represented an empire. From one empire to the next, they were SUCCESSIVE empires - they followed one another. The Babylonian empire was conquered by Persia, which was conquered by Alexander the Great and the Grecians, which was conquered by Rome.
In the end of Nebuchadnezzar's imagery, ONLY the IRON AND CLAY FEET were crushed by a rock, symbolizing JESUS CHRIST at Armageddon. The first three empires had already passed from the scene.
But ALL FOUR of Daniel's four beasts are said to be in power - in existence - when Jesus returns!
These four beasts CANNOT be the ancient kingdoms of Babylon, Persia, Greece and Rome - as most Bible commentators and teachers assert. Here is why:
At Armageddon, Daniel saw that the OTHER THREE BEASTS "had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time. (7:12)"
It is perfectly clear that the fourth beast is a modern kingdom in power when Jesus comes, because the "little horn" on that beast, "made war with the saints, and prevailed against them; Until the Ancient of days came, and judgment was given to the saints of the most High; and the time came that the saints possessed the kingdom," Daniel 7:21-22.
So what does this show and prove?
It proves that Jesus Christ will NOT confront ancient Babylon, ancient Persia, ancient Greece, or ancient Rome at His coming.
He will confront EXISTING MODERN NATIONS at Armageddon.
These PROPHECIES absolutely MUST refer to MODERN NATIONS.
These nations will be stripped of their powers at Armageddon, yet they will continue to exist, "their lives were prolonged for a season and time." That could NOT be true if the LION is ancient Babylon, or if the BEAR is ancient Persia, or if the LEOPARD is ancient Greece, or if the DREADFUL BEAST is ancient Rome.
Therefore:
1. We must identify a MODERN nation that is symbolized by a LION.
2. We must identify a MODERN nation that is symbolized by an EAGLE.
3. We must identify a MODERN nation that is symbolized by a BEAR.
4. We must identify a MODERN nation that is symbolized by a LEOPARD.
5. We must find a MODERN GLOBAL government that fits the description of the DREADFUL BEAST.
We MUST look for these four beasts in modern times. The prophecies can only be true if these nations can be identified at the time of the coming of Jesus Christ for the battle of Armageddon.
All of the conclusions that he boldly declares "MUST" be the case follow from his private and peculiar interpretation of a single verse which states that the beasts of Daniel 7 "had their dominion taken away: yet their lives were prolonged for a season and time." The absurdity of his conclusion is immediately evident when we look at what happened when the stone struck the feet of the Image in Daniel 2:Daniel 2:44 And in the days of these kings shall the God of heaven set up a kingdom, which shall never be destroyed: and the kingdom shall not be left to other people, but it shall break in pieces and consume all these kingdoms, and it shall stand for ever. 45 Forasmuch as thou sawest that the stone was cut out of the mountain without hands, and that it brake in pieces the iron, the brass, the clay, the silver, and the gold; the great God hath made known to the king what shall come to pass hereafter: and the dream is certain, and the interpretation thereof sure.
The SCRIPTURE directly contradicts his primary assertion in which he said:In the end of Nebuchadnezzar's imagery, ONLY the IRON AND CLAY FEET were crushed by a rock, symbolizing JESUS CHRIST at Armageddon. The first three empires had already passed from the scene.
In Daniel 2, the Word of God declares that ALL THE KINGDOMS represented by the Image were destroyed by the Stone cut without hands, and then confirms this fact by listing them all.
Ken Raggio's interpretation of these passages is a hermeneutical abomination. He built his entire futurist interpretation on an erroneous understanding of a single verse that directly contradicts the plain text of Holy Scripture. And then he went on to amplify his egregious error by repeating over and over again that his conclusion MUST MUST MUST follow, that he had PROVED IT and that there was no other possibility.
If this were an isolated case, then perhaps we could say that futurism was a legitimate alternative to understanding Biblical Eschatology. But no, this is not an isolated case. Errors like those of Ken Raggio are the fundamental characteristic of all futurism.
Thanks again for posting this Cheow. It really should help folks understand why the futurist system can not be accepted as a Biblical alternative.
Richard
Bookmarks